Determine the Distance for Balancing Uneven Weights

  • Thread starter Thread starter dyan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balance
AI Thread Summary
To balance uneven weights on a bar, the lighter weight must be positioned farther from the fulcrum than the heavier weight. The relationship between weight and distance is governed by torque, which is the product of weight and distance from the fulcrum. For a 100g weight at 100mm from the center, a 150g weight must be placed approximately 66.67mm (or 2/3 of 100mm) from the center to achieve balance. This demonstrates that the principle is not simply "double the weight, double the distance," but rather "double the weight, halve the distance." Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately balancing weights.
dyan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
does anyone no of a math formula to balance uneven weights?

say if i had a 100g (3.5oz) weight on a bar 100mm (3.9in) from a center point and another weight of 150g (5.5oz) how far will it need to be from the center to level the bar.

could it be as simple as double the weight double the distance?

thanks Dylan
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not exactly. In order to balance, the lighter weight (less mass) must be farther from the fulcrum. It is, instead "double the weight halve the distance". This is more a physics question that mathematics: two objects will balance when their 'torques' about the fulcrum are equal. And torque is equal to weight times distance from the fulcrum. The 100 gram mass has weight 100 g dynes (the "g" here is the acceleration due to gravity" 981 cm/s2 in cgs units. I assume your "g" was "grams".) A distance 100 mm= 10 cm from the fulcrum, it will cause torque of 1000g ergs about the fulcrum. Similarly a mass of 150 grams will have weight 150g dynes and at distance x cm from the fulcrum has torque 150 gx ergs. Setting those equal, 150gx= 1000g so x= 1000g/150g= 100/15= 20/3= (2/3)10 cm.

Notice that 150 is NOT "double" 100- it is 3/2 of it so we get 2/3 the distance.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top