Uniform circular motion lab question

AI Thread Summary
Measuring the period by timing 25 revolutions in a uniform circular motion lab is a compromise to minimize experimental error. Timing too few revolutions increases the percentage error, while timing too many can lead to variations in speed. The choice of 25 is suggested as it balances these uncertainties effectively. Additionally, factors like mis-counting oscillations and timing inaccuracies contribute to measurement uncertainty. A well-rounded conclusion should reflect on how this method addresses these uncertainties and improves the reliability of the results.
sunriserocks
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Could any here smart people help me with the Lab question: 3. Why do we measure the period by timing 25 revolutions? Why not one revolution or 100
revolutions?
This is from http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/denicog/labs/lab11_132.pdf
Lab from Uniform Circular motion.

Thank you so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi sunriserocks! welcome to pf! :smile:
sunriserocks said:
Why do we measure the period by timing 25 revolutions? Why not one revolution or 100 revolutions?

it's a compromise :wink:

too few revolutions, and the experimental error will be too high

but too many revolutions, and the speed will change

so you choose a number that you guess will minimise the total error

the book is advising you that, in this case, 25 is about right :smile:
 
You need to realize that any measurement involves an uncertainty (error).
When you are dealing with oscillations there are 2 obvious causes of uncertainty.
1) you may mis-count the number of oscillations
2) you may mis-time the oscillations
Lets say that you can count the oscillations to within 1, ie you may miss one ! !. So if you decide to count 10 oscillations you could be out by 10%...so count more than 10 oscillations if possible.
Lets say you can time with a stop watch to within 1 second...by the same logic make certain that the time period you measure is more than 10 seconds.
What you decide to do depends on the circumstances. The principal behind it is uncertainty.
If 25 oscillations occur in 2 seconds this is not good enough because of the uncertainty in time.
Tiny tim advice is good
 
Thank you so much guys for the help. Maybe you could also give me advice what should be in the conclusion?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top