Calculating Average Power Density of a Uniform Plane Wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average power density of a monochromatic electromagnetic wave interacting with a crystal plate at a 60-degree angle. The average power density is given as I=10^{-4}\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_{0}}{\mu_{0}}}W.m^{-2}, and the electric field components are defined. Participants are trying to understand the derivation of the relationship between the average power density and the electric field, specifically how the expression for the Poynting vector leads to the conclusion that \left\langle \frac{|\overrightarrow{E}|^{2}}{c\mu_{0}}\right\rangle equals \frac{E_{0}^{2}}{v}. There is confusion regarding the presence of a factor of 1/2 in the average calculation and the implications of considering the fields in a medium. The conversation highlights the complexities of electromagnetic wave theory and the application of Maxwell's equations.
cathode-ray
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A plane monocromatic electromagnetic wave propagates in the air hitting a cristal plate with an incident angle of 60 degrees. The cristal plate has an area A=0.5m^{2}, and is fully illuminated by the wave. The average power density carried by the wave is I=10^{-4}\sqrt{\frac{\varepsilon_{0}}{\mu_{0}}}W.m^{-2} and his electric field is given by:

\overrightarrow{E}=E_{x}\overrightarrow{u}_{x}+E_{z}\overrightarrow{u}_{z}
E_{x}=E_{0}cos(\omega t-ky)
E_{z}=E_{0}sen(\omega t-ky)

c)Calculate E_{0}

Homework Equations



I=\left\langle \overrightarrow{S}\right\rangle S is the Poynting vector
\overrightarrow{H}=\frac{\overrightarrow{B}}{\mu_{0}}
v=\frac{E}{B}

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem came with a solution but I don't understand one of the steps:

I=\left\langle \overrightarrow{S}\right\rangle =\left\langle \overrightarrow{E}\times\overrightarrow{H}\right\rangle =\left\langle \overrightarrow{E}\times\frac{\overrightarrow{B}}{\mu_{0}}\right\rangle =\frac{E_{0}^{2}}{v}

How is \left\langle \overrightarrow{E}\times\frac{\overrightarrow{B}}{\mu_{0}}\right\rangle =\frac{E_{0}^{2}}{v} ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello cathode ray

The E and B fields in an EM wave are related as |\vec B| = \frac{|\vec E|}{c}
This relation is a consequance of Maxwell's curl E equation.
You could check Griffiths sec.9.2.2.
 
Hi!
Sorry for the time I took to answer.
I use that relation to get:

\left\langle \overrightarrow{E}\times\frac{\overrightarrow{B}}{\mu_{0}}\right\rangle \Rightarrow\left\langle \frac{|\overrightarrow{E}|^{2}}{c\mu_{0}}\right\rangle

But I still get stuck. Why is \left\langle \frac{|\overrightarrow{E}|^{2}}{c\mu_{0}}\right\rangle =\frac{E_{0}^{2}}{v}? And shouldn't we get a factor of 1/2 in the final expression because of the average?
 
Hey,

The field are being considered in a medium.
So |\vec B| = \frac{k}{\omega}|\vec E| = \frac{|\vec E|}{v}.
 
Then in that case we get:

\left\langle \frac{|\overrightarrow{E}|^{2}}{v\mu_{0}}\right\rangle

Sorry, but I still don't understand the equality:

\left\langle \frac{E_{o}^{2}}{v\mu_{0}}\right\rangle =\frac{E_{0}^{2}}{v}
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top