Uniform rod pivoting and block/mass energy problem

AI Thread Summary
A uniform rod of mass m and length l pivots from a vertical position, causing a block of mass M to move forward upon contact. The rod loses contact with the block at an angle of θ = 30° to the horizontal. The discussion involves energy conservation and the relationship w² = -(alpha)(tantheta) to derive the mass ratio M/m. The user initially calculated the ratio as 4/3 but questioned the sign of angular acceleration, considering it negative. Clarification confirmed that the angle to the horizontal decreases at an increasing rate, indicating both first and second derivatives are indeed negative.
Alcatrez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
A uniform rod of mass m and length l is pivoted at a point on the ground. The rod is initially in vertical position and touching a block of mass M which is at rest on a horizontal surface. The rod is given a push of negligible force and it starts rotating about that point. This causes the block to move forward. The rod loses contact with the block at θ = 30° with horizontal. All surfaces are smooth.
Find M/m

I have conserved the energy, found a relation of

w² = -(alpha)(tantheta)

by considering x=Lcostheta and double differentiating to get a.

I am getting a correct ans of 4/3 but i had considered alpha (ang acc) to be negative which isn't correct, right?

What's wrong with this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Alcatrez said:
had considered alpha (ang acc) to be negative which isn't correct, right?
Assuming you are referring to the angle to the horizontal, that angle will decrease at an increasing rate, so both its first and second derivatives will be negative.
Have I understood your question?
 
haruspex said:
Assuming you are referring to the angle to the horizontal, that angle will decrease at an increasing rate, so both its first and second derivatives will be negative.
Have I understood your question?
Yes. That's exactly what i meant.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top