Uniform rod resting against rough vertical wall supported by a string.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a uniform rod resting against a rough vertical wall, supported by a string, with specific parameters including a length of 2m and a mass of 3kg. The problem requires calculating the normal reaction at point B, which is approximately 12.7N, and determining the coefficient of friction (μ) as the rod is on the verge of slipping. Participants emphasize the importance of considering the forces acting on the rod, including normal reaction, friction, and tension, with the weight acting from the center of the rod. A labeled diagram is suggested to aid in visualizing the forces involved. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding the equilibrium conditions of the rod.
kozor
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Uniform rod AB with end B resting against rough vertical wall. Coefficient of friction between wall and rod is μ.

Rod is 2m long and has mass 3kg.

Rod is kept in limiting equilibrium by a light inextensible string, one end of which is attached to the end A of the rod and the other to point C on the wall 2m above B. Angle ABC=120°.

The end B of the rod is about to slip down the wall.

1. By taking moments about C, show that the normal reaction at B is approx. 12.7N.

2. Find the value of μ.PS: A labelled diagram would be very helpful! Thanks!

Homework Equations


n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



Have been able to sketch what I think are all the forces acting on the rod, but does the normal reaction + friction + T-resolved = downward force of 2g-resolved? Do I take the weight of the rod to act from the centre?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
kozor said:
PS: A labelled diagram would be very helpful! Thanks!
Yes, it would! Can you provide one?
 
No worries.

http://imageshack.com/a/img836/6874/gykt.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, unless otherwise stated, its safe assume the rod is uniform in which case its center of gravity is at the center
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top