How Does Gauss's Law Apply to the Electric Field in a Uniformly Charged Slab?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ovoleg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charged
AI Thread Summary
Gauss's Law can be applied to determine the electric field within a uniformly charged insulating slab of thickness 2d. The charge density is uniform, and for the region between -d and d, the electric field is derived from the enclosed charge using the equation E = (ρ * x) / ε₀. The assumption that the electric field is zero inside the slab is incorrect; instead, the field is proportional to the distance from the center, indicating that the field is not zero in this region. The misunderstanding arises from the nature of the insulating material, which does not allow for free charge movement but still produces an electric field due to the fixed charge distribution. The correct electric field expression within the slab is E = (ρ * x) / (2ε₀).
ovoleg
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hey guys I was wondering if anyone could help me with this problem

A slab of insulating material has thickness 2d and is oriented so that its faces are parallel to the yz-plane and given by the planes x = d and x = -d. The y- and z dimensions of the slab are very large compared to d and may be treated as essentially infinite. The slab has a uniform positive charge density p(rho). Using Gauss's law, find the electric field between -d<x<d

This is what I did but the system states I am wrong.

pV=Qenclosed

EA=Qenclosed/epsilon

E(r^2)=(rho*r^2*2d)/epsilon

E=rho*2d/epsilon

Thanks anyone :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also thought it might be zero since its inside the material but I am getting that as an incorrect answer as well
 
This is how I trully feel about this problem: This slab is composed of insulating material, and insulating material does not permit easy movement of charge through them(can we assume that they don't move at all and are at rest?). Then, if all the charges are at rest, the field(E) at every point in the interior of the material is zero. With that, when -d < x < d wouldn't the field(E) be zero since for these x values we are talking about the interior of the slab?
 
Anyone please :)
 
E=[|Rho|x]/Epsilon naught
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top