Uniqueness of Group Presentations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Newtime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Uniqueness
Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
I had a few most questions which should be trivial for the group theorists out there, but since I'm still relatively new to this, they have me stumped:

1. Given a presentation, how can one verify it is unique?
2. Given a presentation, how can one verify it is minimal aside from the obvious of manipulating relations into other relations?
3. Given a presentation, how can one verify that one has included all relations? In other words, how can one verify that a presentation is indeed a presentation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A group representation of a group ##G## is a group homomorphism ##\varphi\, : \,G \longrightarrow \operatorname{Aut}(H)## into an automorphism group of some set ##H##, which can be another group, or a vector space, in which we call the representation linear and the automorphism group ##\operatorname{GL}(V)##. This a group representation is the triple ##(G,\varphi,H)##.

It makes no sense to speak of uniqueness, since ##\varphi## is what makes it unique. Different homomorphisms mean different operations mean different representations.

The same goes for minimality. We can always define ##g.h :=h## i.e. map every element on the identity automorphism. This is automatically minimal in which sense you ever measure size.

Since ##\varphi## is required to be a group homomorphism, this is equivalent to the invariance of relations. One has to prove that ##\varphi## is a group homomorphism, so depending on how a representation is defined, the properties have to be proven, i.e. calculated.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top