Unit Conversion Troubleshooting: Identifying and Correcting Common Errors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on troubleshooting unit conversions, highlighting three specific examples that yielded incorrect results. The first conversion from light years per minute to SI units was miscalculated, with confusion about the original SI units. The second conversion from carats per cubic parsec to SI units was incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the carat-to-kilogram conversion factor. The third conversion from furlongs per fortnight to SI units mistakenly used the conversion factor twice and misinterpreted the time frame. Overall, attention to detail in unit definitions and conversion factors is crucial for accurate results.
badtwistoffate
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
:devil:
I have 3 unit conversions and they are not coming out right... what am I doing wrong if you can spot it:
1)1.64ly/min to SI Units:
1ly/min=697.5W/m^2
1144.6W/m^2 but how do you get it with just the oringinal SI units...


2)2.3E27carats/parsec^3 to SI:
2.3E27carats/parsec^3 * (1kg/.0002carats) *( 1 parsec^3/2.938e49 m^3) = 3.91E-19 but is nothing like what google says !


3)642 furlongs per fortnight to SI:
642 furlongs/fortnight * (201.2m/1furlong)*(1/[24*60*60])*(201.2m/1furlong)=.107m/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, light years/min? That's a unit of velocity and W/m^2 is a unit of intensity.
 
langleys/min
 
You want the units to be basic SI-units? Well, Watt is J/s and Joule is Nm and Newton is kg m/s^2.

You calculated the second one wrong. I got 1.566*10^(-26) kg/m^3. Pay attention to what you do when you change units. Remember that 1 carat = 0.0002 kg, not 1kg = 0.0002 carat.
 
badtwistoffate said:
642 furlongs per fortnight to SI:
642 furlongs/fortnight * (201.2m/1furlong)*(1/[24*60*60])*(201.2m/1furlong)=.107m/s?

That's just one day, not a fortnight.

And why twice 201.2m/1 furlong?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top