Unit vector tangential to curve

hypn0tika
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Find the expression for the unit vector tangential to the curve given in spherical coordinates by r = 1, \phi = 2\theta, 0 \leq \theta \leq \pi

the equation for the differential length vector for spherical coordinates:
dl = drar + rd\thetaa\theta + rsin(\theta)d\phia\phi
where ar, a\theta, and a\phi are unit vectors

i used the equations for the curve to determine that:
dr = 0, d\phi = 2d\theta

by substituting into the differential length vector, i got:
rd\theta[a\theta + 2sin(\theta)a\phi]
i know this is not a unit vector, but i am lost. i think there would need to be either a cosine or a way to get rid of that sine in the differential length vector equation for the expression to be a unit vector.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm lost, too. Mostly because I don't get your notation. d(phi) isn't a unit vector, it's a 1-form. And I don't have any idea what a 'differential length vector' is. Maybe somebody does, but in the meantime, have you just considered treating this as a parametric equation in cartesian coordinates and working from there?
 
Last edited:
my fault. when i said d(theta) and d(phi) were unit vectors i mean a(theta), a(phi).
 
Ok, I'm starting to get the notation. aphi e.g. is the vector \frac{\partial}{\partial \phi} etc. I would not call them unit vectors (they don't have unit length). You haven't written an expression for the tangent vector itself yet. What is it? The curve's (r,theta,phi) coordinates are (1,theta,theta*2).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top