Unitary Operator on a Tensor Product

barnflakes
Messages
156
Reaction score
4
Having a little trouble deriving a result in a book.

If I have an operator of the form e^{\alpha A \otimes I_n}

Where alpha is a complex constant, A a square hermitian matrix and I the identity matrix.

Now if I want to operator that on a tensor product, say for instance c_{n,1} |1 \rangle \otimes |n \rangle then how would I do that?

I firstly used the identity e^{\alpha A \otimes I_n} = e^{\alpha A \otimes I_n} to obtain:
e^{\alpha A \otimes I_n} {} | c_{n,1} |1 \rangle \otimes |n \rangle \rangle = e^{\alpha A} \otimes I_n {} |c_{n,1} {}|1\rangle \otimes |n \rangle \rangle = c_{n,1} e^{\alpha A}{}|1\rangle \otimes |n \rangle

but my book gets c_{n,1} e^{\alpha}|1 \rangle \otimes |n \rangle with no further explanation. By the way the form of the matrix A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & 0 \\0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} if it helps to know it.

Also I am aware you can represent e^{\alpha A} in the form of an infinite series but I don't see how that helps here. In fact I tried it and I didn't know where I should cut the series off at, and it gave me coefficients of alpha rather than e^alpha. Oh and the n's are being summed over, not sure if that makes any difference.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
e^{A\otimes B}|\alpha\rangle\otimes|\beta\rangle=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}(A\otimes B)^n|\alpha\rangle\otimes|\beta\rangle=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}\underbrace{(A\otimes B)\cdots(A\otimes B)}_{n\text{ factors}}|\alpha\rangle\otimes|\beta\rangle

=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}\underbrace{(A\otimes B)\cdots(A\otimes B)}_{n-1\text{ factors}}A|\alpha\rangle\otimes B|\beta\rangle=\dots=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}A^n|\alpha\rangle\otimes B^n|\beta\rangle

Now what do you get when you set B=I?
 
Thank you for your reply Fredrik, however I'm still stuck.

Using your definition \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}A^n|\alpha\rangle\otimes B^n|\beta\rangle applied to the above expression, I obtain:

\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}(\alpha A)^k|1\rangle\otimes|n\rangle

I cannot quite see how to turn that into e^{\alpha}|1 \rangle \otimes |n \rangle

What happens to the matrix A? The vector |1\rangle is an eigenvector of A with eigenvalue 1.

So can I express the above as:

\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}(\alpha A)^k|1\rangle \otimes|n\rangle = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!}(\alpha)^k A^k|1\rangle \otimes|n \rangle and then work out A^k |1\rangle

However, I don't know how to work out A^k |1\rangle ? I know that A |1\rangle = 1 |1\rangle = |1\rangle but how can I use this to calculate the action of A^k?
 
Hold on, I have solved it!

A^k = A.A...A k times therefore A^k |1 \rangle = |1\rangle

Thank you Fredrik :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top