Units of Coulomb, trouble understanding the question

  • Thread starter Thread starter JFonseka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb Units
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force between two charges, q1 = 4.9 e C and q2 = -3.6 e C, which are 105 nm apart, using the formula F = kqq/r^2. The initial confusion arose from the interpretation of "e C," leading to uncertainty about whether to multiply by the elementary charge value of 1.6 x 10^-19 C. It was clarified that "e" already represents this value, meaning q1 should not be treated as having a unit of Coulomb-Coulomb. Ultimately, the misunderstanding was resolved, confirming that the values for q1 and q2 are correctly expressed in terms of elementary charge. The problem was deemed solved.
JFonseka
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two charges, q1 = 4.9 e C and q2 = -3.6 e C are located 105nm apart, what is the size of the force between the two charges?

Homework Equations



F=kqq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I did it according to the formula and I got the answer wrong, so I checked it using an online force calculator between charges, and it gave the same answer I initially got. I looked up what e C is, thinking maybe it's indicating something smaller than 1 C, and couldn't really find a graduation for that, what am I doing wrong? Is it meant to be multiplied by 1.6 x 10^-19?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually q_1 = 4.9 e C is somewhat incorrect. e = 1.6\times10^{-19}C is the elementary charge and already contain the unit Coulomb. So it is as if q_1 has unit Coulomb-Coulomb.
 
mathfeel said:
Actually q_1 = 4.9 e C is somewhat incorrect. e = 1.6\times10^{-19}C is the elementary charge and already contain the unit Coulomb. So it is as if q_1 has unit Coulomb-Coulomb.

So does this mean that I have to multiply 4.9 by 1.6x10^-19?
 
Nvm, problem(s) solved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top