Unknown Substance: c=0.182772277 cal/g*C

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the specific heat capacity of a substance, noted as c = 0.182772277 cal/g * C. Participants express uncertainty about the identity of the substance, confirming it is not glass, which typically has a specific heat of around 0.18. A suggestion is made to consult a chart of common substances and their specific heats, with a reminder to convert units using the factor of 4.184 Joules per Calorie if necessary. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precision in scientific measurements, noting that values should reflect their uncertainty. It is highlighted that using excessive significant digits can lead to inaccuracies in calculations, and any experimentally derived values should include an error analysis to ensure reliability.
PrudensOptimus
Messages
641
Reaction score
0
c = 0.182772277 cal/g * C

What type of substance is it? it's not glass.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Do you have a chart of common substances and their specific heats? If not, I'm sure you could find one on the internet. If the specific heats listed are in different units use the conversion factor 4.184Joules/Calorie.
 
Originally posted by eku_girl83
Do you have a chart of common substances and their specific heats? If not, I'm sure you could find one on the internet. If the specific heats listed are in different units use the conversion factor 4.184Joules/Calorie.


My table only has 0.18 for Glass. And I know is not glass.
 
actually it probably is given the general acceptance of the idea of approximate input giving apporximate output, which is is used as an excuse by lazy textbook writers to give what they consider to be a "significant" number of digits. Basically except for those of us (like me) who are the most anal about precision .18 and .182772277 are the same.
 
A good table of such values will display the uncertianity in the given values. To use digits beyond the given known errors is to introduce garbage in your calculations. If a number is given to 2 or 3 digits, simply assume that the error is .5 of the first unspecified digit.

Any experimentally computed value should include an error analysis of the measurements required to complete the computation.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top