Unproven claim in Weinberg's textbook

  • Thread starter Thread starter dEdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a claim made by Weinberg in his Lectures on Quantum Mechanics regarding the form of solutions to the Schrödinger equation for a central potential. Participants explore the implications of the statement that if a wavefunction is an eigenfunction of certain operators, it can be expressed in a specific separable form involving radial and angular components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests a proof of Weinberg's claim that the wavefunction can be expressed as \(\psi(\mathbf{x})=R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)\) based on the action of \(\mathbf{L}^2\) on angles.
  • Another participant suggests focusing on the intuition behind the claim rather than seeking a rigorous proof, indicating that the general idea is applicable to various problems.
  • A later reply asserts that the claim is trivial when considering the uniparticle Hilbert space for a 'dummy' particle, explaining that the wavefunction can be represented as a product of a function of \(r\) and a function of spherical angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of Weinberg's claim, with some considering it trivial and others seeking a proof. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the clarity and implications of the claim.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for further elaboration on the mathematical foundations of the claim, particularly regarding the assumptions underlying the separation of variables in the context of the Schrödinger equation.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
In his Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Weinberg makes the following claim about solutions to the Schrödinger equation for a central potential: Suppose [itex]\psi(\mathbf{x},t)[/itex] is an eigenfunction of [itex]H[/itex], [itex]\mathbf{L}^2[/itex], and [itex]L_z[/itex]. According to Weinberg, "since [itex]\mathbf{L}^2[/itex] acts only on angles, such a wavefunction must be proportional to a function only of angles, with a coefficient of proportionality [itex]R[/itex] that can depend only on [itex]r[/itex]. That is, for all r,
[tex]\psi(\mathbf{x})=R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)."[/tex]

He does not elaborate further on this, in my view, non-trivial statement. Can someone here provide a proof of his claim?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
He does not elaborate further on this, in my view, non-trivial statement. Can someone here provide a proof of his claim?

I'd be inclined to work on the intuition behind that claim instead of looking for a rigorous proof, because the general idea is useful in so many other problems.

But first, which part of the statement are you asking about? The part about ##L^2## acting only on ##\theta## and ##\phi##, or the claim that this implies the ##R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)## form of the solution?
 
I'm talking about the claim that [itex]\psi=R(r)Y(\theta,\phi)[/itex] given that [itex]\mathbf{L}^2[/itex] acts only on angles.
 
This is trivial once you consider the uniparticle Hilbert space for the 'dummy' particle 'moving' aroung the CoM. Its Hilbert space is L^2(R^3) = L^2 (R) X L^2 (R) X L^2 (R) and after performing a unitary transformation of the whole space you have that L^2(R^3) ~ L^((0,infinity),dr) X L^2 (S^2,dOmega).

In the position space the wavefunction of the 'dummy' particle would be then a product of a (sq integrable) function of r times a product of a function of spherical angles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K