Unraveling the Mystery of Current: Expressing F in Seconds and Ohms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing capacitance in Farads in terms of seconds and Ohms within the context of an RC circuit. The user initially struggles with the mathematical manipulation involving current, resistance, and capacitance. They mistakenly conclude that Farads equal zero due to an error in their logarithmic calculations. Clarification is provided that, when considering the relationship between charge, time, and resistance, an Ohm-Farad indeed has the dimension of time. Ultimately, the user gains understanding of the dimensional analysis and the nature of the equations involved.
nate92488
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have this problem I just can't figure out.

Current = A (Ampere)

i(t)=z(e^t/(RC))

where z is the initial current at t=0, R is the resistance in Ohms and C is the capacitance expressed in secondary units as F (Farad)

- Express the units of F in terms of seconds and ohms

So, this is what I tried to do, tell me where I went wrong

A = A e^(s/F-Ohms)

1 = e^(s/F-Ohms)

ln(1) = s/F-Ohms

0 = s/F-Ohms

F = 0

I obviously did something wrong, so any help would be apreciated, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you think of an RC circuit as a second order differential equation you will see

dQ/dT + 1/(R*C)*Q = Junk

Where junk = 0 for a loop of a circuit without any external components. Otherwise it can also be some forcing function driven by batteries, power sources, etc. But anyways, Q is the charge here so...

dQ/dT = charge/time (amps)

thus Q*1/(R*C) = charge/time since Q = charge, R*C has dimension [T]

Thus an Ohm-Farad has dimension [T] and the quantity in the exponent in your equation is dimensionless then - as it should be
 
thank you, I got it now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top