Unraveling the Mystery of Planetary Motion: Mercury & Pluto

AI Thread Summary
Mercury moves with high velocity due to its proximity to the Sun and the strong gravitational pull it experiences, which keeps it in a stable elliptical orbit. In contrast, Pluto's greater distance from the Sun results in a weaker gravitational influence, allowing it to move more slowly without being pulled into the Sun. If Pluto were to move as quickly as Mercury, it would escape the solar system instead of maintaining an orbit. The discussion highlights the relationship between gravitational force, distance, and orbital velocity, illustrating how these factors determine the motion of celestial bodies. Understanding Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion is essential to grasp the dynamics of these planetary movements.
physicallove
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
why does mercury move with such velocity while pluto is much slower?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Study Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion, then it will make sense.
 
thank you!
 
If Pluto had as much velocity as Mercury does, it would be moving too fast for Sun's relatively weak gravity to bend its orbit into an ellipse; the fast-moving Pluto would just sail on by the solar system.

If Mercury moved as slowly as Pluto does, it would be moving too slow to stay in its elliptical orbit under the Sun's very strong pull, and would fall into the sun.

Indeed, (highly simplified) in the early years of the solar system, there would have been many bodies with many different velocities just like that. They flew off or collided with each other fell into the sun until the only ones left were the few we see that found stable orbits and stopped crashing into each other.
 
The centripetal acceleration is:
<br /> a = \frac{v^{2}}{r}<br />

If this acceleration is provided by a gravitational force $F(r)$ from the Sun, that somehow varies with distance, then:
<br /> F(r) = m a<br />


From here. by knowing how the force varies with distance, we can find how the velocity varies with distance:
<br /> v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{r F(r)}{m}}<br />
The velocity will not depend on distance iff:
<br /> F(r) = O(\frac{1}{r})<br />
If the gravitational force falls off with distance faster than this, then the orbital velocity of more distant bodies should decrease. On the other hand, if it falls off more slowly, then it will increase.
 
Dickfore said:
The centripetal acceleration is:
<br /> a = \frac{v^{2}}{r}<br />

If this acceleration is provided by a gravitational force $F(r)$ from the Sun, that somehow varies with distance, then:
<br /> F(r) = m a<br />


From here. by knowing how the force varies with distance, we can find how the velocity varies with distance:
<br /> v(r) = \sqrt{\frac{r F(r)}{m}}<br />
The velocity will not depend on distance iff:
<br /> F(r) = O(\frac{1}{r})<br />
If the gravitational force falls off with distance faster than this, then the orbital velocity of more distant bodies should decrease. On the other hand, if it falls off more slowly, then it will increase.

Judging by the question being asked, do you think this answer will be useful (comprehensible) to the OP? :rolleyes:
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top