Unraveling the Mystery of Quantum Mechanics: Square Wells & Momentum

Ze Corndog
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here's an image
http://i.imgur.com/oC8Y6.jpg

Homework Equations


The wave function for an infinite square well, the expectation values and operators for momentum and I guess the normalization condition? I don't really know because I don't understand the question.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand what I'm being asked there exactly. It just doesn't seem clear to me at all. What does that notation for the momentum mean? I figured Px is the one-dimensional momentum in the x-direction, but what's that N superscript? I've never seen that notation anywhere in my textbook or even in the lectures... does it mean Px for any N?

What's in an eigenstate of the energy? I'm assuming the particle... but what's that mean? The energy is En for any n?

I'd like to be able to do this on my own but this is probably the most unclear question I've ever had in physics. It also doesn't help that this is the first QM problem I'm encountering.

Isn't the expectation value of Px just 0? That's what my textbook says, but that doesn't seem like what I'm being asked to find... or is it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


It's a one dimensional box so the Px seems redundant. Anyhow, it seems it is asking you to find the expectation value of momentum raised to some power. So, yes, find Px for N being 1,2,3,4 etc ie find < p >, < p^2>, etc.

You seem to have the right idea.

You are right that < p > = 0, but < p^2 > is not zero.
 


So do I just have to solve for a general expression of <p^N>?
 


That's how I interpret it.
 


Thanks for clearing that up

What about this one?
http://i.imgur.com/0hq6l.jpg
I'm guessing that means 0.5*<a function of position*momentum + momentum*position>
isn't the function just <2*x*p>?
and then taking half of that would just be <x*p>

that's the way I see it, but I feel like I'm wrong
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top