Unraveling Weak Field Stark Effect in Hydrogen

PHamnett
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Considering the n = 2 states of hydrogen: In the absense of an external field, the four j = 1/2 states are degenerate. Using degenerate pertubation theory, I am supposed to show that for a very weak field the Stark effect shifts the energy levels by

\mp \sqrt{3}a_0 e \epsilon

where a_0 is the bohr radius, e is the electric charge and \epsilon is the electric field


The solutions state that we should get the following equations:
<1 1/2 1/2 | z | 0 1/2 1/2> = -\sqrt{1/3}<1 0 | z | 0 0>

and

<1 1/2 -1/2 | z | 0 1/2 -1/2> = \sqrt{1/3}<1 0 | z | 0 0>

and then from there a pertubed hamiltonian is constructed.

But to be honest, none of it seems to make sense and me and my friend do not know where even the first line of the solutions comes from. Yet alone the rest.
Any light that could be shed on the situation would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What term is being added to the unperturbed Hamiltonian? Start by figuring that out. Then it should be clear why you need to find the matrix elements of z.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top