Unused Alphabet Letters & Irregular Distance in Loading Coils

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayryap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the irregular use of alphabet letters in designating loading coil distances in telephone lines. Participants note that not all letters are utilized, and there is no consistent pattern in the spacing designations. Specific distances associated with certain letters are provided, highlighting variations in the lengths. Questions arise regarding the source of these distances, with a suggestion that some may seem shorter than typical. The conversation emphasizes the lack of standardization in loading coil designation.
jayryap
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Why not all letters of the alphabet are used in loading coil distance?
and why there is no pattern followed in the spacing designation?thank you very much...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jayryap said:
Why not all letters of the alphabet are used in loading coil distance?
and why there is no pattern followed in the spacing designation?thank you very much...

Could you please clarify your question? Do you mean this kind of loading coil?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loading_coil

.
 
sir, loading coils in telephone lines,A=700 ft
B=3000 ft
C=929 ft
D=4500 ft
E=5575 ft
F=2787 ft
H=6000 ft
X=680 ft
Y=2130 ft

thank you very much...
 
jayryap said:
sir, loading coils in telephone lines,


A=700 ft
B=3000 ft
C=929 ft
D=4500 ft
E=5575 ft
F=2787 ft
H=6000 ft
X=680 ft
Y=2130 ft

thank you very much...

Those distances sound kind of short for load coils (the H looks to be more typical). Where did you get them?

http://www.charlesindustries.com/main/te_coils.html

.
 
Back
Top