Use of method of undetermined coefficients

vineethbs
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Use of "method of undetermined coefficients"

Hi all,

Suppose I have a equation

f(z+1) - f(z) = z^{1/2} , \forall z \geq 0eq (1)

then is it possible to solve this equation by the method of undetermined coefficients ?

It is usually seen in textbooks that the forcing function is taken to be sinusoidal or polynomial or exponential when the method of undetermined coefficients is used. Why is this so ? What kind of properties must the forcing function satisfy so that this method can be used ?

In the above eq (1), if suppose I assume that f(z) is say
c_{1} z^{1/2} + c_{2} + c_{3} z^{-1/2} + \cdots
and then substitute in eq (1),
then can I do a Taylor series expansion for an arbitrarily large z ?
for eg :
c_{1} (z + 1)^{1/2} = c_{1} z^{1/2} * (1 + \frac{1}{z})^{1/2}

and then expand out the 1 + .. term in a Taylor series expansion ?

Does this lead to a series solution ?Thanks in advance for spending your time on this
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


vineethbs said:
Hi all,

Suppose I have a equation

f(z+1) - f(z) = z^{1/2} , \forall z \geq 0eq (1)

then is it possible to solve this equation by the method of undetermined coefficients ?

It is usually seen in textbooks that the forcing function is taken to be sinusoidal or polynomial or exponential when the method of undetermined coefficients is used. Why is this so ? What kind of properties must the forcing function satisfy so that this method can be used ?
Essentially because those are the kind of solution you would expect for a linear difference (or differential) equation with constant coefficients because a linear operator with constant coefficients will map those kinds of functions into themselves. If the "forcing function" (more physics terminology- Bah!) is not of that kind you cannot use the "method of undetermined coefficients" because you cannot expect the correct function to be a square root. You will need to use something like "variation of parameters".

In the above eq (1), if suppose I assume that f(z) is say
c_{1} z^{1/2} + c_{2} + c_{3} z^{-1/2} + \cdots
and then substitute in eq (1),
then can I do a Taylor series expansion for an arbitrarily large z ?
for eg :
c_{1} (z + 1)^{1/2} = c_{1} z^{1/2} * (1 + \frac{1}{z})^{1/2}

and then expand out the 1 + .. term in a Taylor series expansion ?

Does this lead to a series solution ?


Thanks in advance for spending your time on this
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top