Uses of type I superconductors

ijustlost
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know of any practical uses for a type I superconductor, where it isn't possible to use a type II (which typically have higher critical temperatures so need less cooling etc)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There must be a reason that Type I SCs are used in SQUIDs (resolution?).
 
Whether or not a superconductor is type I or II is generally of little importance in most applications. All high-Tc superconductors are type II so if you want to work at high temperatures there is no choice.
There are only a few low-Tc superconductors that are actually used and most of them are type II. Niobium and its superconducting alloys are all type II and are used in almost all real-life applications of superconductivity (including MRI magnets) since the Tc is rather high and they can carry reasonably high currents.
Anyway; the most important low-Tc superconductor for fundamental research is aluminium but that has little to do with the fact that it is type I; the main advantage is instead that aluminium-oxide is a very good insulator and can be created by simply exposing aluminium to an oxygen atmosphere during fabrication. This means that high-quality junctions can be created which in turn means that we can fabricate multilayer structures such as Josephson junctions, SQUIDs, SETs etc using relatively straightforward methods (shadow evaporation). It is MUCH harder to fabricate good Nb structures (and even then aluminium-oxide is used as the insulator).
Aluminium also has a fairly high Tc (1.2-1.6K) meaning even a simply He-3 cryostat will often do.

Most low-Tc SQUIDs are fabricated from niobium and aluminium SQUIDs are rarely used as actual magnetometers; Al SQUIDs are usually just used as "tunable Josephson junctions" since we can control the critical current (and therefore Ej) using an external magnetic field (this is used in e.g. split Cooper-pair boxes etc).
 
f95toli said:
Most low-Tc SQUIDs are fabricated from niobium and aluminium SQUIDs are rarely used as actual magnetometers; Al SQUIDs are usually just used as "tunable Josephson junctions" since we can control the critical current (and therefore Ej) using an external magnetic field (this is used in e.g. split Cooper-pair boxes etc).
I have no idea what a split Cooper-pair box is, but thanks for the clarification anyway.


Aluminium also has a fairly high Tc (1.2-1.6K) meaning even a simply He-3 cryostat will often do.
Or even a He-4 cryostat! (or was that a typo?)
 
Gokul43201 said:
Or even a He-4 cryostat! (or was that a typo?)

Unfortunately not. A pumped He-4 cryostat will get down to 1.3-1.4K but that is still too close to Tc for most applications (the IV curve of an Al Josephson junction will be extremely smeared out at 1.3K, and it might not be superconducting at all).
Fortunately pumped He-3 cryostats are quite cheap nowadays so most labs can afford them; they will get down to about 260-300 mK and have a hold time of about 24 hours when wired up correctly. There are even cryogen-free closed-cycle He-3 systems that use cryocoolers to liquefy the He-3; meaning you do not even need liquid He-4 to cool the system (unfortunately they are very noisy; we have one where I work and the sound drives me nuts whenever I have to spend any time in that lab).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top