Using a photodiode in near darkness

  • Thread starter Thread starter Artlav
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photodiode
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around maximizing the sensitivity of a photodiode in near darkness, focusing on circuit design involving current-to-voltage amplifiers, feedback resistors, and noise management. Participants explore various configurations and theoretical considerations related to the use of operational amplifiers (op-amps) in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about achieving maximum sensitivity from a photodiode and discusses the use of a current-to-voltage amplifier with a feedback resistor of 1 MOhm, noting issues with oscillation at higher resistances.
  • Another participant suggests increasing the supply voltage beyond 5 V to potentially achieve a larger output voltage.
  • Concerns are raised about the feedback resistor value, with a participant questioning if 1 MOhm is appropriate for the current levels expected from the photodiode, which they estimate to be around 1 µA.
  • Participants discuss the importance of the photodiode's capacitance and its effect on the amplifier's stability and frequency response, with one noting that oscillations may be due to parasitic effects from long leads.
  • One participant mentions their lack of experience with op-amps and expresses confusion about the relationship between supply voltage and amplification.
  • Another participant provides a link to an application bulletin from Burr Brown, suggesting it may contain useful ideas for the circuit design.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriate feedback resistor values, with one participant estimating the current they are trying to detect to be below 5 nA, and questioning the feasibility of using higher resistance values.
  • Concerns about noise are raised, with participants describing different types of noise observed in the circuit and discussing potential solutions, including the use of capacitors and series resistors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the optimal configuration for the photodiode circuit, with no consensus reached on the best approach to mitigate noise and oscillation issues. Multiple competing views remain about the appropriate feedback resistor values and the implications of supply voltage on circuit performance.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their understanding and experience with op-amps, as well as the need for specific data from the photodiode's datasheet to make informed decisions. There are unresolved questions regarding the capacitance of the diode and its impact on circuit behavior.

  • #61
jrive said:
Another option for you, if you need higher gain (without requiring the huge feedback resistor whichi adds noise) and faster response is not necessary is to use a phototransistor instead of the photodiode. Not sure what your application is, but if you're dealing with low light, and speed is not an issue, they are better suited.
Phototransistors are kind of rare for non-visible and ir bands, and the idea of my project was to use various photodiodes to see in various bands, from ~5um to ultraviolet.

Basic description of the project is here:
http://orbides.1gb.ru/photobot.php?lng=eng

The bandwidth needed is only about 1KHz - the motors don't go faster.

The sensitivity at 2.2GOhms is already somewhat too much, actually - it gets off the scale in broad sunlight. At the same time, indoors it's almost too faint to see, so i tried some higher values with little success due to resistor's structure.
jrive said:
Another option yet is to use a T-network feedback scheme which will enable you to increase your gain significantly without having to resort to huge valued resistors...
I can't google up much on "T-network feedback", can you provide any details?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #62
I have been busy as my wife just had hip replacement on Monday. Really don't have time to think about this for now.

Regarding on the sticky at 0, I have no idea as the circuit recovery time is so much shorter than what you are describing.

Regarding to too much gain in bright light and not enough in dark, use two different feedback resistors and use relay to kick it in an out. Say you use two feedback resistor, one is 500M, the other is 5G. One end of both resistor connect directly to pin 2 of the opamp. The other end connect to the relay. The relay is to switch the output of the opamp to either the 500M or 5G. You then switch the relay depend on the brightness of the surrounding. Easy. That's what we do all the time, you don't get enough dynamic range from one resistor.
 
  • #63
yungman said:
I have been busy as my wife just had hip replacement on Monday. Really don't have time to think about this for now.
No problems, I'm in no hurry. Good health to her.

When you get some time, or someone else look at this, here is he situation so far.
I've been trying to get negative supply for the amp. The best idea i had is MAX660 charge pump chip, turning +5V into -5V. 10uF cap for the pump, 100uF one to filter the output voltage, but I'm still getting a load of noise just from the thing being here. Also tried at different frequencies and with different caps - the noise does not go away.

So, is there either a way to set up the negative voltage properly, or a way to remove sticking without using that?
 
  • #64
The solution have found the problem.
Not surprisingly, it was all in the manual.

AD820 have two NULL pins for offset voltage compensation, by linking these to +5V with 4.7K and 10K resistors, i got the output 0 to be in the 9 to 30 range (1=5mV), depending on the PD used.
And presto, nothing sticks to anything, without any troublesome negative voltages.
 
  • #65
Glad you find the problem. Are you going to put in the relay to extend the range for different situation? I think it should work as you can have one setting for indoor or night, and the other setting for bright outdoor.

The T-Network is a common scheme that use a voltage divider with low value resistor and the big resistor connects to the divider. eg. If you need a 1G resistor. You can use a divider using 9K and 1K to divide the output by 10, then you only need to use a 100M resistor to connect to the divider to pin 2 and get the same gain. The big down side is the noise is going to increase by 10 times and the offset will increase by 10 times. The good point is you get to use a smaller feedback resistor and therefore increase speed.

I did not suggest the T-network because you are dealing with noise already at the time. It is a standard practice to avoid using T-network unless you really run into speed problem. This is no different than using a 100M resistor and then put a X10 gain stage following it. All the problems are amplified by 10 times using this.
 
  • #66
yungman said:
Glad you find the problem. Are you going to put in the relay to extend the range for different situation? I think it should work as you can have one setting for indoor or night, and the other setting for bright outdoor.
Something like this, quite likely. A simple manual switch with three positions should suffice - sunlight, overcast, indoors. 500M, 2.2G, ~10G respectively. It's not moving around fast enough to warrant the complexity of a relay.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K