Using a solar cell as a qualitative test of laser intensity

AI Thread Summary
Using a solar cell to test the intensity of a nitrogen laser is a viable method, as solar cells can effectively measure output current related to laser intensity. It is recommended to diffuse the laser beam slightly to ensure a more uniform response across the solar cell's surface, as the presence of surface structures can affect measurements. Moving the solar cell around during testing can help identify any variations in current readings. For precise measurements, especially for continuous wave power or single pulse energy, a dedicated laser power meter is advisable. This approach provides a practical solution for comparing laser designs without the need for expensive sensors.
trini
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
so I am testing out different designs on a nitrogen laser, and wanted a quick way to test whether or not one design had a more intense output than the other. without having to buy a sensor, my idea was to direct the beam onto a solar cell, then measure the output current. higher current wud mean higher intensity. is this a reasonable assumption for the test?
 
Science news on Phys.org
nothing? =(
 
trini said:
so I am testing out different designs on a nitrogen laser, and wanted a quick way to test whether or not one design had a more intense output than the other. without having to buy a sensor, my idea was to direct the beam onto a solar cell, then measure the output current. higher current wud mean higher intensity. is this a reasonable assumption for the test?

Yes, that is the easiest way. I work with silicon detectors for ATLAS, and they are essentially solar cells. This is what we do to measure the intensity of a laser in the lab.
 
  • Like
Likes DDnoob
great thanks =)
 
If it's a very small spot you might want to diffuse it a little - solar cells have structures on the surface (electrodes etc) so the response might depend on exactly where on the cell you hit.

Try moving the sensor around by a few mm as you measure and see if there is any difference in the current
 
trini said:
so I am testing out different designs on a nitrogen laser, and wanted a quick way to test whether or not one design had a more intense output than the other. without having to buy a sensor, my idea was to direct the beam onto a solar cell, then measure the output current. higher current wud mean higher intensity. is this a reasonable assumption for the test?

Knowing the wavelength, here's what you may expect as a response:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Response_silicon_photodiode.svg

If ever you need accurate measurements of average cw power or single pulse energy, google "laser power meter".
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top