Using Abelian Gauge relating to theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gauge Theory
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59

Homework Statement


sNtNV22.jpg


Homework Equations


Please see below.

The Attempt at a Solution


No idea about part (a).

Trying to work out part (b), I asked my tutor and he said:

The derivation is the one where we assume the Dirac equation is invariant under local gauge transformations.

I think it's this. We have the Dirac Equation $$\left ( i \hbar \gamma ^{\mu } \partial_{\mu }-mc\right )\Psi =0$$ but for a local phase shift we have to let $$\Psi \rightarrow \Psi ^{'}= e^{i\alpha (x)}\Psi $$

If we do this we get an unwanted term, i.e. invarience is lost.

Therfore we put $$\partial\mu \rightarrow D\mu= \partial\mu - \frac{iq}{\hbar}A_{\mu}$$

From this we can define $$A_{\mu}^{'}=A_{\mu}+ \frac{\hbar}{q}\partial_{\mu}\alpha (x)$$

Which would then make the thing varient.

My question is how does this relate to the (b) question? is this what it is asking, I have no idea.

Any suggestions more than welcome!

for part (c) haven't I just done that? not sure what it wants.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think I have this. You derive the A mu dash term and then this says that there must be some form of EM interaction for the dirac equation to be satisfied.

edit

Also for part (A) ... QED with Abelian gauge theory with group U(1)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top