Using complex description of div and curl in 2d?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mappe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Complex Curl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the concepts of divergence and curl in two-dimensional space using complex variables. It highlights the relationships where divergence is expressed as 2Re(d/dz f(z,z_)) and curl as 2Im(d/dz f(z,z)), with f(z,z) representing a function in terms of complex variables. Participants explore methods to prove fundamental properties of divergence and curl through the analysis of d/dz f(z,z). The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper intuition regarding these mathematical concepts. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on the application of complex analysis to vector calculus.
Mappe
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In trying to get an intuition for curl and divergence, I've understood that in the case of R2, div f(x,y) = 2Re( d/dz f(z,z_)) and curl f(x,y) = 2Im( d/dz f(z,z)), where f(z,z) is just f(x,y) expressed in z and z conjugate (z). Is there any way of proving the fundamental properties of div and curl and/or understanding them better by looking at d/dz f(z,z)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
some characters did not write out, f(z,z_) its supposed to say, with z_ being complex conjugate
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top