Using Continuous Uniform MGF to find E(X)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darth Frodo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Uniform
Darth Frodo
Messages
211
Reaction score
1


Continuous Uniform MGF is M_{x}(z) = E(e^zx) = \frac{e^{zb} - e^{za}}{zb - za}

\frac{d}{dz}M_{x}(z) = E(X)

Using the Product Rule

\ U = e^{bz} - e^{az}

\ V = (zb - za)^{-1}

\ U' = be^{bz} - ae^{az}

\ V' = -1(zb - za)^{-2}(b - a)

\frac{dM}{dz} = UV' + VU'

\frac{dM}{dz} = (e^{bz} - e^{az})(-1(zb - za)^{-2}(b - a)) + ((zb - za)^{-1})(be^{bz} - ae^{az}) evaluated at z = 1


\ (e^{b}-e^{a})(-1)(b - a)^{-2}(b - a) + (b - a)^{-1}(be^{b} - ae^{a})


\frac{e^{a} - e^{b} + be^{b} - ae^{a} }{b - a}


The answer is \frac{b + a}{2}


I'd really appreciate it if someone could tell me where I'm going wrong. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You didn't define your terms. What is MGF and what is E(X). These may be standard, but I don't know them.
 
Moment Generating Function and Expected Value of the Continuous random variable X
 
Darth Frodo said:
Continuous Uniform MGF is M_{x}(z) = E(e^zx) = \frac{e^{zb} - e^{za}}{zb - za}

\frac{d}{dz}M_{x}(z) = E(X)

Using the Product Rule

\ U = e^{bz} - e^{az}

\ V = (zb - za)^{-1}

\ U' = be^{bz} - ae^{az}

\ V' = -1(zb - za)^{-2}(b - a)

\frac{dM}{dz} = UV' + VU'

\frac{dM}{dz} = (e^{bz} - e^{az})(-1(zb - za)^{-2}(b - a)) + ((zb - za)^{-1})(be^{bz} - ae^{az}) evaluated at z = 1


\ (e^{b}-e^{a})(-1)(b - a)^{-2}(b - a) + (b - a)^{-1}(be^{b} - ae^{a})


\frac{e^{a} - e^{b} + be^{b} - ae^{a} }{b - a}


The answer is \frac{b + a}{2}


I'd really appreciate it if someone could tell me where I'm going wrong. Thanks.

You need to evaluate M'(z) at z = 0, not at z = 1! Of course, you need to worry about the fact that your formula for M(z) does not apply right at z = 0, so you need to look at limits as z → 0, and use l'Hospital's rule, for example. BTW: the formula you wrote for EX is wrong; it should be
EX = \left. \frac{d M(z)}{dz} \right|_{z = 0} = M'(0). For ##z \neq 0## the derivative of M does not have any particular relation to EX.

However, that would be doing it the hard way. From
M_X(z) = E e^{zX} = 1 + z \,EX + \frac{z^2}{2} E X^2 + \cdots,
we see that we can get the moments of X from the moment-generating-function---that's why it is so named---so all you need is the series expansion of M(z) around z = 0 (that is, the Maclaurin series). That is most easily obtained by just getting the series expansion of the numerator, then dividing by z.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top