Using Norton's Theorem to Solve for Io in a Complex Circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter raddian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around using Norton's Theorem to find the current Io in a complex circuit. Participants explore various methods, including mesh analysis, Thevenin's theorem, and nodal analysis, to approach the problem. The conversation includes both theoretical and practical aspects of circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in applying Norton's Theorem and considers breaking down the circuit further.
  • Another participant suggests that using other methods alongside Norton's Theorem is acceptable, emphasizing the importance of determining the Norton equivalent resistance.
  • A participant shares their successful solution using mesh analysis and QUCS, noting challenges in applying Norton's or Thevenin's theorems effectively.
  • Some participants propose using Thevenin's theorem and nodal analysis as alternative approaches, highlighting the ease of finding equivalent resistances with sources suppressed.
  • There is a discussion about converting Thevenin equivalents to Norton equivalents and the relationship between voltages in the circuit.
  • One participant reports finding the open-circuit voltage and equivalent resistance using Thevenin and nodal analysis, providing specific values for these parameters.
  • A follow-up question arises regarding the implementation of a current-controlled voltage source in QUCS, indicating a need for clarification on its usage.
  • Another participant points out a potential issue in the wiring of the controlled current source, suggesting that it may short a resistor in the circuit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the best approach to solve the problem, with no consensus on whether to strictly use Norton's Theorem or to incorporate other methods. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most effective strategy for the circuit analysis.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note specific values and calculations, but there are unresolved issues regarding the application of Norton's Theorem and the wiring of components in the QUCS schematic. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and approaches to circuit analysis.

raddian
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find Io using Norton's Theorem

Homework Equations


Screenshot - 06112015 - 11:09:31 AM.png


The Attempt at a Solution


I broke it into the following circuit:
Snapshot.jpg

I would like to break it down some more but if I open the node between 3k and 6k (ohms), and 6k and 6k (ohms), I run into problems...

What should I do to make sure I stick to Norton's Theor
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot - 06112015 - 11:09:31 AM.png
    Screenshot - 06112015 - 11:09:31 AM.png
    3.5 KB · Views: 857
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you're restricted to using Norton's Theorem exclusively. It should be sufficient to determine the Norton equivalent of the network driving the current through the 6 k "load" using whatever means you wish. You might begin by suppressing all the sources and determining the Norton resistance.

By the way, 2 k + 3 k is not 6 k :wink:
 
I just took a while and solved the problem by hand using mesh analysis with a supermesh and then put the circuit into QUCS and verified my answer.

I am having a hard time seeing how it would be easily done with norton's theorem or thevenin's theorem. I got a value for the equivalent resistance seen by the load resistor but breaking down the circuit to find the voltage across the terminals of the load resistor would lead me back to using mesh.

supermesh.png
 
Last edited:
I'd go for a Thevenin approach and Nodal Analysis. Finding the Thevenin resistance (same as Norton resistance) is pretty easy with the sources suppressed. Removing the 6k load to open-circuit the output (For Thevenin you want the open-circuit voltage) leaves a single essential node. The rest is just finding particular potentials along branches.
 
Yeah I agree that would be another way. converting the thevenin equivalent into a norton equivalent. The equivalent resistance is easy to find

supermesh.png


The difference in voltages Vx and Vy is the thevenin equivalent voltage
 
gneill said:
I don't think you're restricted to using Norton's Theorem exclusively. It should be sufficient to determine the Norton equivalent of the network driving the current through the 6 k "load" using whatever means you wish. You might begin by suppressing all the sources and determining the Norton resistance.

By the way, 2 k + 3 k is not 6 k :wink:

At first I didn't know what you meant by "driving the current through the 6 k "load" using whatever means you wish." but with FOIWATER's picture:

supermesh-png.84725.png


I am able to understand now. Thank you! I will try my best to solve this using the techniques you suggested!
 
I was able to find the Voltage between the open circuit using Thevenin and Node analysis: I got Vth = ~10.8 V (making Vy facing positive and Vx near negative), and Rth = 33/5. So the short circuit current is 10.8/6.6=1.6464 and current division between the load and 6.6 KOhms makes the load current 0.857. This hsould be negative because of the way the current is facing and the way I had my voltages set up. Thanks everyone!

(Btw FOIWATER, your R6 resister should be 3k)
 
Glad you figured it out friend.
 
Follow up question on using QUCS:
I'm trying to make a current controlled voltage source matching this diagram...:
Screenshot - 06122015 - 01:09:17 PM.png

Im not sure how exactly the current controlled voltage source is used in qucs.. Examples help, but I didnt know the right name for it in the examples given in qucs

Screenshot - 06122015 - 01:10:27 PM.png

Code:
<Qucs Schematic 0.0.18>
<Properties>
  <View=-50,-814,893,-265,1,287,0>
  <Grid=10,10,1>
  <DataSet=5.11.dat>
  <DataDisplay=5.11.dpl>
  <OpenDisplay=1>
  <Script=5.11.m>
  <RunScript=0>
  <showFrame=0>
  <FrameText0=Title>
  <FrameText1=Drawn By:>
  <FrameText2=Date:>
  <FrameText3=Revision:>
</Properties>
<Symbol>
  <.ID -20 -16 SUB>
  <Line -20 20 40 0 #000080 2 1>
  <Line 20 20 0 -40 #000080 2 1>
  <Line -20 -20 40 0 #000080 2 1>
  <Line -20 20 0 -40 #000080 2 1>
</Symbol>
<Components>
  <R R1 1 230 -450 15 -26 0 1 "3000 Ohm" 1 "26.85" 0 "0.0" 0 "0.0" 0 "26.85" 0 "US" 0>
  <R R2 1 440 -450 15 -26 0 1 "6000 Ohm" 1 "26.85" 0 "0.0" 0 "0.0" 0 "26.85" 0 "US" 0>
  <R R4 1 530 -630 -26 15 0 0 "2000 Ohm" 1 "26.85" 0 "0.0" 0 "0.0" 0 "26.85" 0 "US" 0>
  <Idc I1 1 80 -450 18 -26 0 1 "8 mA" 1>
  <IProbe Pr1 1 600 -430 16 -26 1 3>
  <GND * 1 430 -310 0 0 0 0>
  <CCVS SRC1 1 340 -620 34 -26 1 3 "4000" 1 "4000" 0>
  <.DC DC1 1 40 -540 0 43 0 0 "26.85" 0 "0.001" 0 "1 pA" 0 "1 uV" 0 "no" 0 "150" 0 "no" 0 "none" 0 "CroutLU" 0>
  <Idc I2 1 420 -780 -26 18 0 0 "2 mA" 1>
</Components>
<Wires>
  <440 -580 500 -580 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <230 -310 430 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <230 -590 230 -480 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <560 -620 600 -620 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <230 -420 230 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <440 -580 440 -480 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <440 -420 440 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <500 -630 500 -580 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <560 -630 560 -620 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <80 -310 230 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <80 -420 80 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <80 -480 230 -480 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <230 -590 310 -590 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <440 -310 600 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <600 -400 600 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <600 -620 600 -460 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <430 -310 440 -310 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <370 -590 370 -580 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <370 -580 440 -580 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <370 -670 370 -650 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <370 -670 560 -670 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <560 -670 560 -630 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <310 -660 310 -650 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <310 -660 500 -660 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <500 -660 500 -630 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <230 -780 230 -590 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <230 -780 390 -780 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <600 -780 600 -620 "" 0 0 0 "">
  <450 -780 600 -780 "" 0 0 0 "">
</Wires>
<Diagrams>
</Diagrams>
<Paintings>
</Paintings>
 
  • #10
R4 is shorted by your wiring of the controlled current source "sense line". Note that there is a path from the top of R5 to the top of R2 that does not pass through R4!
Fig1.gif
 
  • #11
Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K