Using parameterisation to calculate work done by force

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
feetnappy
A force F = -K(yi + xj) (K is a positive constant) acts on a particle moving in the x-y plane. Starting from the origin, the particle is taken along the positive x-axis to the point (a, 0) and then parallel to the y-axis to the point (a, a). What is the total work done by the force F on the particle.

My attempt:

As the final position of the particle is (a, a) so I get the following using parameterisation for 0 <= t <= 1

x = at
y = at

Thus the work done,

W = integration -k(ydx + xdy)
= integration -k(atdt + atdt)
= integration -k(2atdt)
= -2ak integration (tdt)
= -ak [t]^2
= -ak

What am I doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
feetnappy said:
A force F = -K(yi + xj) (K is a positive constant) acts on a particle moving in the x-y plane. Starting from the origin, the particle is taken along the positive x-axis to the point (a, 0) and then parallel to the y-axis to the point (a, a). What is the total work done by the force F on the particle.

My attempt:

As the final position of the particle is (a, a) so I get the following using parameterisation for 0 <= t <= 1

x = at
y = at

Thus the work done,

W = integration -k(ydx + xdy)
= integration -k(atdt + atdt)
= integration -k(2atdt)
= -2ak integration (tdt)
= -ak [t]^2
= -ak

What am I doing wrong here?

Why do you go along a straight line from (0,0) to (a,a)? The question said to go along the sides of the square. Of course, for some types of forces the work done is independent of the path, but is that the case here?

Anyway, even for the diagonal path, have you double-checked your work?
 
Last edited: