Using the First Isomorphism Theorem

CurtBuck
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand the first isomorphism theorem for groups.

Part of the examples given in the book is showing that Q[x]/(x^3-3) is isomorphic to {a+b*sqrt(3)}

As I understand it, by finding a homomorphism from Q[x] to {a+b*sqrt(3)} in which the kernel is x^3-3, the two are isomorphic.

I am struggling in finding the homomorphism from Q[x] to {a+b*sqrt(3)}

Any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure it's not supposed to be Q[x]/(x2-3)?
 
Yeah, it was supposed to be Q[x]/(x^2-3)
 
You need to find an element in Q[x]/(x2-3) whose square is equal to 3, i.e. you want to find some y such that y2+(x2-3) = 3+(x2-3) (y is a polynomial here). So there's really two steps here

1) Find y.
2) Use y to construct an isomorphism
 
the homomorphism sends x to sqrt(3).

when you mod out by f(x), you make f(x) = 0, so x becomes a root of f. since sqrt(3) is the root of x^2-3, x becomes sqrt(3).
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top