Using the Flux Formula for Different Charge Distributions

AI Thread Summary
The Flux Formula, expressed as q_enc/ε_0 = Φ, can be applied to any closed surface regardless of whether the enclosed charge is a point charge or a continuous charge distribution. The key factor is that the formula relies on the total charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface, not the nature of the charge itself. Therefore, both point charges and non-point charge distributions yield the same result when calculating electric flux. Understanding this principle clarifies the application of the formula in various scenarios. The charge distribution does not affect the validity of the flux calculation.
oneplusone
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
I am confused about when you can use the formula ##\dfrac{q_{enc}}{\epsilon_0} = \Phi## for flux. Is it only when you have a closed surface with point charges? What if you have a closed surface with a non-point charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge q is just the total charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface. The distribution doesn't matter. In particular, there is no distinction between point charges and a charge distribution.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top