Utter Confusion on Projectile Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a missile launched from a MiG-29, with the user seeking guidance on solving projectile motion without direct answers. The user prefers explanations that incorporate visual aids and is focused on using kinematic equations rather than calculus. Key aspects of the problem include calculating the missile's maximum altitude, total flight time, and downrange distance, while ignoring factors like air resistance and Earth's curvature. Participants suggest breaking down the initial velocity into vertical and horizontal components to facilitate the calculations. The conversation emphasizes a collaborative approach to understanding the principles of projectile motion.
marshmallowchicken
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'd just like to say hello to everyone as I'm new here but will be here frequently because Physics is like a foreign language to me.

Alright, I have a physics problem that is never going to be solved by my own brain, at least not until I see it solved. I would prefer that you just don't give me the answer, but explain how to do it. If you could include any diagrams, that would be very helpful due to my apparent preference on visual-spacial learning. So now, here's the problem:

A Russian-built MiG-29 was flying upward at an angle of 35 degrees with the vertical at 650 mph at an altitude of 82,000 feet when it launched a missile in a futile attempt to disable an American spy satellite. The missile accelerated along this line of travel at a rate of 40 feet per second, per second for 85 seconds before it ran out of fuel. The missile missed the satellit, did not explode, and eventually fell to earth. Ignoring air resistance, the curvature of the Earth, and fluctuations in the gravitational acceleration, Find:

a) The maximum altitude reached by the missile,

b) The total time of the missile's flight, and

c) The downrange distance from the launch point to the point of impact on the ground.

*Use 32 feet per second, per second, as the gravitational acceleration.



Thanks in advance for any help that can be offered.

Regards,
marshmallowchicken
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you solving these problems using calculus or using some known formulas?
 
?

Well, I'm in basic Physics which isn't supposed to apply any calculus functions.

I belive, though I don't see how, that he would like use to use the kinematic equations which are:

^2 = Squared
>0 = Initial or Subscript 0

V = V>0 + at
X = X>0 + V>0t + ½at^2
X = X>0 + vt – ½at^2
V^2 = V>0^2 + 2a(X-X>0)
X = X>0 + ½(V>0 + V)t

Regards,
marshmallowchicken[/color]
 
Do you know how to find the vertical and horizontal components of the speed?

Maybe this will help you for problem one. At the apex of the missle the Y component of velocity is 0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top