Utter Confusion on Projectile Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a missile launched from a MiG-29, with the user seeking guidance on solving projectile motion without direct answers. The user prefers explanations that incorporate visual aids and is focused on using kinematic equations rather than calculus. Key aspects of the problem include calculating the missile's maximum altitude, total flight time, and downrange distance, while ignoring factors like air resistance and Earth's curvature. Participants suggest breaking down the initial velocity into vertical and horizontal components to facilitate the calculations. The conversation emphasizes a collaborative approach to understanding the principles of projectile motion.
marshmallowchicken
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'd just like to say hello to everyone as I'm new here but will be here frequently because Physics is like a foreign language to me.

Alright, I have a physics problem that is never going to be solved by my own brain, at least not until I see it solved. I would prefer that you just don't give me the answer, but explain how to do it. If you could include any diagrams, that would be very helpful due to my apparent preference on visual-spacial learning. So now, here's the problem:

A Russian-built MiG-29 was flying upward at an angle of 35 degrees with the vertical at 650 mph at an altitude of 82,000 feet when it launched a missile in a futile attempt to disable an American spy satellite. The missile accelerated along this line of travel at a rate of 40 feet per second, per second for 85 seconds before it ran out of fuel. The missile missed the satellit, did not explode, and eventually fell to earth. Ignoring air resistance, the curvature of the Earth, and fluctuations in the gravitational acceleration, Find:

a) The maximum altitude reached by the missile,

b) The total time of the missile's flight, and

c) The downrange distance from the launch point to the point of impact on the ground.

*Use 32 feet per second, per second, as the gravitational acceleration.



Thanks in advance for any help that can be offered.

Regards,
marshmallowchicken
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you solving these problems using calculus or using some known formulas?
 
?

Well, I'm in basic Physics which isn't supposed to apply any calculus functions.

I belive, though I don't see how, that he would like use to use the kinematic equations which are:

^2 = Squared
>0 = Initial or Subscript 0

V = V>0 + at
X = X>0 + V>0t + ½at^2
X = X>0 + vt – ½at^2
V^2 = V>0^2 + 2a(X-X>0)
X = X>0 + ½(V>0 + V)t

Regards,
marshmallowchicken[/color]
 
Do you know how to find the vertical and horizontal components of the speed?

Maybe this will help you for problem one. At the apex of the missle the Y component of velocity is 0.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top