UVA vs UVB: Why does UVA penetrate deeper into the skin?

AI Thread Summary
UVA radiation, with its longer wavelength, penetrates deeper into the skin than UVB radiation, which has a shorter wavelength. This phenomenon is attributed to the scattering properties of light; longer wavelengths scatter less in biological tissues, allowing them to penetrate more effectively. While UVB rays have higher energy and intensity, they scatter more upon interaction with skin, leading to surface burns. In contrast, UVA rays penetrate deeper without causing immediate surface damage. Additionally, absorption characteristics of tissues play a role, as water, which constitutes a significant part of skin, absorbs UVB radiation more than UVA, further contributing to the deeper penetration of UVA.
finnch
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

My name is Chris and I am trying to understand why UVA radiation, with a longer wavelength, penetrates deeper into the skin than UVB which has a shorter wavelength.

Since E=hv=hc/ λ and
c44eb3c2af933606f2bb928132d7ec21.png
,

then how does a lower energy and lower intensity UVA wave penetrate deeper into the skin than a UVB wave?

Pardoning the pun, I would appreciate it if someone could enlighten me :eek:)

Many thanks...
 
Biology news on Phys.org
In general, longer wavelength light will always pennetrate deeper into a scattering medium. This is the same reason why the sun appears red at sunset.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
In general, longer wavelength light will always pennetrate deeper into a scattering medium. This is the same reason why the sun appears red at sunset.

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your reply but I disagree with your response. In our atmosphere, blue light, with a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) scatters more than red light with a longer wavelength and lower frequency. Scattering is proportional to frequency raised to the power of four...See

An X-Ray has a very high frequency, i.e short wavelength and penetrates both skin and bone and is consistent with the energy and intensity formulas cited earlier. So again, I am trying to find justification for why a longer wave, lower frequency UVA ray penetrates deeper than a shorter wave, higher frequency, higher energy, higher intensity UVB ray.

Thank you,

Chris
 
finnch said:
Dear Sir,

Thank you for your reply but I disagree with your response. In our atmosphere, blue light, with a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) scatters more than red light with a longer wavelength and lower frequency. Scattering is proportional to frequency raised to the power of four...See

An X-Ray has a very high frequency, i.e short wavelength and penetrates both skin and bone and is consistent with the energy and intensity formulas cited earlier. So again, I am trying to find justification for why a longer wave, lower frequency UVA ray penetrates deeper than a shorter wave, higher frequency, higher energy, higher intensity UVB ray.

Thank you,

Chris
Sorry Ygggdrasil,

After a little more reflection, your response does make sense and the youtube video I posted earlier actually supports your response. I was looking for an explanation considering only the energy side of the question without considering the scattering when the light actually interacts with matter. So I guess that when dermatologists tell us that UVB burns more but UVA penetrates more deeply, then it's the scattering of the UVB along the surface of our bodies that causes the surface burn while the longer UVA transmits deeper into the skin without burning the surface as much?

Thank you for your help.

Chris
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top