V^2 is used in certain formulae. Physically, what does it mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sydneybself
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulae Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the meaning of V^2 in the context of physics equations, particularly in relation to kinetic energy and momentum. It highlights that V^2 appears in the equation FD = MV^2, which is derived from the work-energy theorem. The conversation emphasizes that while V^2 itself is just a fragment of an equation, it plays a crucial role in understanding kinetic energy as equal to Mv^2/2 when a constant force acts on an object. Additionally, the relationship between momentum and velocity is discussed, noting that for low velocities, the momentum versus velocity graph is linear, leading to insights about kinetic energy. Overall, the discussion connects fundamental physics concepts and their implications in understanding motion and energy.
sydneybself
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
We are all familiar with E=MC2, although I don't know how that formula relates to the big bang. In any case, I suspect I don't have the math to understand it and it would probably take several pages to define it.

Everyone is familiar with F=MA. What most people don't know is that if you multiply both sides of that equation by D (distance), you get FD = MV2 which is the mathematical equivalent of E= MC2.

What I am curious about is what does that equation mean? I know, physically, what velocity (D/T) is, I know physically what acceleration (D/T2) is, but I don't know physically what V2is? Can anyone explain it in simple terms?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

You have it there: E=FD (or W=FD). So V2 comes into pay in (kinetic) energy type equations. By itself V2 is nothing though; it is just a fragment of an equation.
 
sydneybself said:
What most people don't know is that if you multiply both sides of that equation by D (distance), you get FD = MV2

With an appropriate factor of 1/2, this just a special case of the work-energy theorem, which is taught in every first-year physics course, and which I taught to my students last week. If a constant force (directed parallel to motion) acts on an object that starts from rest, and that moves a distance D, then the force does work FD on the object, and this is equal to the kinetic energy Mv^2/2 that the body picks up.
 
Energy, momentum, force, time and distance

A force acting on an object will accelerate the object in the direction of the action of the force.

The product of the force and the time it acts is equal to the product of the mass of the object and its velocity at that specified time and is the object's momentum.

Plot the graph of the object's momentum versus its velocity.

For velocities which are small compared with lightspeed this graph will be linear. The area underneath it is the area of a triangle, which is half base times height.

This is 1/2 x momentum x velocity which equals 1/2/mv^2.

So, the kinetic energy of a moving body can be thought of as being equal to its momentum integrated with respect to its velocity which is not only interesting but also largely ignored by physics teachers!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top