Values of ##k## for which ##A_{ij}A_{ij} = |\vec a|^2##?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the values of k for which the equation A_{ij}A_{ij} = |\vec a|^2 holds, given the antisymmetric tensor A_{ij} = kε_{ijk}a_k. The attempt at a solution leads to A_{ij}A_{ij} resulting in zero, indicating a potential error in the calculations. Participants highlight the importance of correctly applying the summation convention, particularly with the Kronecker delta identity. The conversation emphasizes the need to reassess the numerical factors involved in the calculations to avoid discrepancies. The resolution of this problem hinges on accurately interpreting the summation convention and its implications for the tensor product.
Incand
Messages
334
Reaction score
47

Homework Statement


The antisymmetric tensor is constructed from a vector ##\vec a## according to ##A_{ij} = k\varepsilon_{ijk}a_k##.
For which values of ##k## is ##A_{ij}A_{ij} = |\vec a|^2##?

Homework Equations


Identity
##\varepsilon_{ijk}\varepsilon_{klm} = \delta_{il}\delta_{jm}-\delta_{im}\delta_{jl}##

The Attempt at a Solution


##A_{ij}A_{ij} = k^2\varepsilon_{ijk}\varepsilon_{ijm}a_ka_m = k^2\varepsilon_{jki}\varepsilon_{ijm}a_ka_m = k^2(\delta_{jj}\delta_{km}-\delta_{jm}\delta_{kj})a_ka_m = k^2(\delta_{km}-\delta_{km})a_ka_m =0##
Which I obviously shouldn't get but I can't see where I'm making an error.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are using the summation convention, so
$$\delta_{jj} \equiv \sum_{j=1}^3 \delta_{jj}.$$
This gives a different numerical factor in front of the first ##\delta_{km}## term.
 
  • Like
Likes Incand
fzero said:
You are using the summation convention, so
$$\delta_{jj} \equiv \sum_{j=1}^3 \delta_{jj}.$$
This gives a different numerical factor in front of the first ##\delta_{km}## term.
Right thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top