Van Der Waals Forces: Overview & Q&A

AI Thread Summary
Van der Waals forces are weak attractions between temporary dipoles created by the uneven distribution of electrons in molecules. These forces increase with larger surface areas between molecules, allowing for more interaction. Dipole-dipole interactions involve permanent dipoles and are stronger than van der Waals forces. Additionally, hydrogen bonding and ionic forces are even stronger, influencing the boiling and melting points of substances. Clarification on double and triple bonds indicates they represent the sharing of two and three electrons, respectively.
Sirsh
Messages
262
Reaction score
10
Hi could someone please give me a run down of these forces? I'm studying them atm but do not really understand them. also, are double and triple bonds representations of 2electrons being shared and 3 electrons being shared? also, when drawing electrondot diagrams for molecules ect. are ionics the only ones where you draw both atms by themselves? thanks a lot to whoever helps :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
van der Waals forces:

These are very weak forces between temporary dipoles. The electrons around a molecule aren't always symmetrical. If at a particular moment, more electrons are around the left side of a molecule than the right, then the left side carries a partial negative charge and the right side carries a partial positive charge. These partial positive and negative charges will be attracted toward partial negative and positive charges on other molecules.

These forces are relatively very weak, but as the surface area between two molecules increases, the van der Waals forces increase because there is more room for interaction.

Dipole-dipole interactions are similar to van der Waals, but these forces are between permanent dipoles while van der Waals forces are between temporary dipoles. Dipole-dipole interactions are a lot stronger than van der Waals forces.

Hydrogen bonding and ionic forces are stronger than dipole-dipole, and the stronger the intermolecular forces in a substance are, the higher the boiling and melting points will be.

You seem to have the right idea about double and triple covalent bonds, and I'm not sure what you mean in your last question.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top