Vanishing Wavefunction: Show Expectation Values of x and p Vanish

  • Thread starter Thread starter misterpickle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
misterpickle
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If <x> and <p> are the expectation values of x and p formed with the wave-function of a one-dimensional system, show that the expectation value of x and p formed with the wave-function vanishes. The wavefunction is:

\phi(x)=exp(-\frac{i}{h}\langle p\rangle x)\psi(x+\langle x\rangle)Basically I don't know how to start this problem. Do I plug in the integral forms of the expectation values into the exponential and distribute the psi over x and \langle x\rangle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out some important text, but I found the problem set with a google search. \langle x\rangle, \langle p\rangle are computed with the wavefunction \psi(x), i.e.

\langle x\rangle = \int x \psi^*(x) \psi(x) \, dx, \ldots

You are asked to compute expectation values with the wavefunction \phi(x):

\langle x\rangle_\phi = \int x \phi^*(x) \phi(x) \, dx, \ldots

These expressions can be reduced to expectation values for certain quantities in the wavefunction \psi(x). You don't have to do any integrals explicity, just some algebra and derivatives.
 
I've set it up the way you suggested, and the exponential terms computing \langle x \rangle cancel. However there is a \langle x \rangle term in \psi(x+\langle x \rangle). Is this not a discrepancy to have the value you are trying to calculate inside the equation for calculating its value?

Specifically,

\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}
 
misterpickle said:
I've set it up the way you suggested, and the exponential terms computing \langle x \rangle cancel. However there is a \langle x \rangle term in \psi(x+\langle x \rangle). Is this not a discrepancy to have the value you are trying to calculate inside the equation for calculating its value?

Specifically,

\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}

Well \langle x \rangle is just a number (it came out of another integral over x, so it doesn't depend on x). There's still something you have to do to this integral though.
 
If \psi(x+\langle x \rangle) is distributable (meaning f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)) then I come up with the following:

\int{ x \psi^{*}(x+\langle x \rangle) \psi(x+\langle x \rangle)\,dx}
\int{ x[ (\psi^{*}x+\psi^{*}\langle x \rangle)( \psi x+\psi\langle x \rangle)\,dx}
\int{ (\psi^{*}\psi x^{3}+2\psi^{*}\psi x^{2}\langle x \rangle+\psi^{*}\psi x\langle x \rangle^{2})\,dx}
\langle x^{3}\rangle +2\langle x^{2}\langle x \rangle\rangle + \langle x\langle x\rangle^{2}\rangle

...which doesn't make any sense to me. Also the "distributable" assumption I made does not work for exponentials, since f(x+y)=f(x)f(y) for exponential functions.
 
Yeah wavefunctions will almost never have that property since they're always related to exponential functions. Think about how you can convert this to an expectation value in \psi(x) by making a substitution in the integration variable.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top