Variable torque due to rotation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics project involving a beam rotating about a pivot with two masses attached, where the goal is to analyze the system's variable torque and resulting motion. The user has calculated the moment of inertia and identified that the torque decreases as the system accelerates, leading to a complex relationship between acceleration and angular speed. They propose using energy conservation principles to model the system, treating the masses and beam parts as point masses to simplify calculations. By equating potential and kinetic energy, they aim to derive the final angular speed of the system. The user seeks further insights on their approach and its mathematical implications.
Accumulator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, all! I just registered here, and hope to enjoy enlightening discussions about the subject of physics in the future.
The spesific reason for the post is a project I am currently concerning myself with. I hit a snag recently, and hope to resolve it with help from others here. Here goes:

Background

I'll ignore friction and air resistance in the following.
I'm making an apparatus consisting of a beam (B) rotating about a pivot (A), loaded with two masses M and m; one attached to each end. It looks like a sort of see-saw.
Now, there are three forces in play, all due to gravity:
-The force on the largest mass M, GM
-The force on the smaller mass m, Gm
-The force on the beam itself, GB.

Please note that A may be different from the beam's centre of gravity.
The system is designed so that of the three resulting torques (only two if the beam's weight doesn't set up a torque about A), TM will always be bigger than the other(s).
The result is that the system will be set in rotational motion if held in an initial position, and then released. The mass M will move in an arc downwards, and then hit some kind of blockage (e.g. the floor).

I have calculated the system's moment of inertia (I), and the magnitude of the three torques are easily found. The angle between the beam and the horizontal axis will be denoted as θ.

Problem:

Once the system is released, the total torque will accelerate the system from rest because of ΣT = Iα.
In so doing, the mass M will move through a small angle dθ, and the lever arm of TM will be shortened since the arm is equal to R*cos(θ). Thus the torque decreases, and also the acceleration. The same is true for the mass m on the other side of the pivot, only that its torque in the other (negative) direction is decreased.
The net result I'm guessing will be a steadily decreasing acceleration and an angular speed that keeps growing throughout the motion, but less and less with time.

How do I model this change in acceleration and speed mathematically?
My goal is to calculate the final speed of the masses M and m, but I can't quite relate the varying quantities to time. My guess is that this will lead to some differential equations, and I'm not steady enough with my math to crack this one.
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how to answer your question, but I'd guess a first year college text in dynamics (as opposed to statics) would provide some formulas and application ideas. I guess that would be part of a mechanical engineering curriculum? Wikipedia might also be a source with some formulas to use...
 
Thank you for your answer, Naty1!
I have a book on university physics, but sadly mechanics are not my field, and the theory on rotational dynamics covered doesn't quite help me figuring it out.
Maybe this should have been posted on the mathematics subforums instead? It seems like this calls for more calculus than I can muster at the moment.

I will continue my investigations, and appreciate all additional thoughts on the matter! =)
 
Okay, I think I made some headway, so I'll share my thoughts to see whether I'm on the right track.

My new approach is to use energy considerations. I'll treat the two halves of the system as separate, that is, each mass and the part of the beam that is on its side of the pivot is one entity.
Then, by treating both the masses and the beam parts as point masses, and setting a sensible reference level for the gravitational potential energy (the floor), the entire rotational motion amounts to moving four point masses up or down in the gravitational field. Thus

EP1 + EK1 = EP2 + EK2,

and since the system is at rest at startup, it reduces to

EP1 = EP2 + EK2.

Now, as the half with the heavier mass M is going to fall downwards, M's potential energy and its beam part's PE is going to decrease.
The lighter mass m and its beam part, however, will rise up, and gain PE.
Calculating the net resulting PE and comparing with the initial PE gives a difference which must be the system's final kinetic energy.
And finally, given this kinetic energy, one can use

EK = (1/2)*I*ω2

yielding

ω = sqrt(2*I*EK).

Since this last calculation considers the moment of inertia, I don't see that my simplification in the energy part should influence the final speed here.

That's it, any thoughts?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top