Variation of mass in a system and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
A system can decrease its velocity without external forces if its mass is varying, as illustrated by a freight car receiving sand. The key factor is that the incoming sand creates friction, which acts as a force causing deceleration. This friction can be viewed as either an internal or external force, depending on how the system boundaries are defined. Mathematically, conservation of linear momentum suggests that the velocity will decrease with the addition of mass, even if the mass appears suddenly. Ultimately, the interplay between mass increase and friction plays a critical role in the system's velocity change.
Soren4
Messages
127
Reaction score
2
Is it really possible for a system to decrease its velocity with no forces acting on it, just because the mass in it is "varying"?

Consider for example a freight car and a hooper from which sand is released into the car. The freight car will decrease its initial velocity if there is no force supplied, but that's not because its mass is increasing, but because the sand that comes into the freight car produces friction with it (equivalently "tries" to be accelerated) and the friction force is the one that makes the velocity of the freight car decrease.

So actually there is a force, which cause the acceleration (deceleration). Is this correct? Or it is really just the increasing of mass that change the velocity of the freight car?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soren4 said:
Is it really possible for a system to decrease its velocity with no forces acting on it, just because the mass in it is "varying"?

Consider for example a freight car and a hooper from which sand is released into the car. The freight car will decrease its initial velocity if there is no force supplied, but that's not because its mass is increasing, but because the sand that comes into the freight car produces friction with it (equivalently "tries" to be accelerated) and the friction force is the one that makes the velocity of the freight car decrease.

So actually there is a force, which cause the acceleration (deceleration). Is this correct? Or it is really just the increasing of mass that change the velocity of the freight car?
I know a physical explanation would be more affective, but mathematically, conservation of linear momentum would cause the velocity to decrease even if mass just appeared in the freight car.
 
  • Like
Likes Soren4
Here are two physical explanations. Pick one that feels right.

Draw the boundary for the system containing the freight car between the sand that is still falling and the sand which has just hit the pile and has not yet finished sliding to rest. The freight car loses velocity because the average velocity of its contents is decreased by the addition of the new zero-velocity sand. The force of friction does not enter in because it is an internal force.

Draw the boundary for the system containing the freight car between the sand which is sliding to rest and the sand that has finished settling. The freight car loses velocity from friction. Under this description, the friction is an external force. The averaging effect does not enter in because the sand that moves from outside the system to inside is at zero velocity relative to the car.
 
  • Like
Likes Soren4
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top