Varying with respect to vierbein

  • Thread starter Thread starter pleasehelpmeno
  • Start date Start date
pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hi
Can anyone explain how to vary an action e.g \int d^4 x e [\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\partial^{\mu} \phi + i\bar{\psi}\bar{\gamma}^{\mu}D_{\mu}\psi] w.r.t the vierbein?

Where e here is the determinant of the vierbein, and D_{\mu} is = to \partial_\mu + \frac{1}{4}\gamma_{\alpha \beta} \omega_{\mu}^{\alpha \beta}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first term, I think you actually mean ##\partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi = g^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu \phi \partial_\nu \phi##. So remember that the metric is made of vierbeins.

For the second term, are you assuming the spin connection is a function of the vierbein, or is it an independent field? If the spin connection depends on the vierbein, then write down the expression for it in terms of the vierbein, and vary that.

For the determinant, same technique applies as for varying the metric determinant.
 
I know that the answer should be T^{\mu \nu} = i/2 [\bar{\psi}\bar{\gamma}(\mu D_\nu)\psi - \bar{\psi}D(\mu \bar{\gamma}_\nu)\psi, but i just don't see why
 
I don't have the time to do the calculation, but you should check Van Proeyen's book on SUGRA. He treats in great detail these kind of calculations. Also, you didn't answer Ben's question: do you treat the spin connection as dependent field? The different treatments (first, second, one and a half order) can be confusing.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top