Vector analysis in mathematica

big-ted
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm trying to do some vector analysis in Mathematica 6. I have the vector analysis package loaded via: << VectorAnalysis`

I'm working in the default cartesian coordinate system, but just to be on the safe side I have set: SetCoordinates[Cartesian]

The grad operator seems to work ok, as in the example in the help file:

Grad[2 Xx^2 + Yy]
gives
{4 Xx, 1, 0}

But anything else seems to just return the input. Eg:

Cross[Xx,Yy]
gives
Xx\[Cross]Yy

But I know this should be Zz!

Same for Dot, Curl etc. I'm not too experienced with Mathematica. Hopefully someone can point out a simple mistake I'm making!

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cross is not defined
try
CrossProduct[Xx,Yy]
 
Whoops, that was just a mistake in my copying code over to the forum. I had it as CrossProduct. Still no dice.

I managed to do what I needed to do by specifying all the components explicitly. Ie:
x = {1,0,0}; etc.

It seems there should be a better way of doing this though, else what would even be the purpose of Mathematica recognising the variable names Xx, Yy, Zz as "special"?
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top