Vector calculus - Divergence Theorem

In summary, the problem involves finding the integral of a vector function over a surface defined by a sphere. Using Gauss's theorem and converting between cartesian and spherical coordinates, the solution can be found by evaluating the divergence of the vector function and using the given limits of integration.
  • #1
44
0

Homework Statement




Find [tex]\int_{s} \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{a}[/tex] given [tex]\vec{A} = ( x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k} ) ( x^2 + y^2 + z^2 )[/tex] and the surface S is defined by the sphere [tex]R^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2[/tex] directly and by Gauss's theorem.

Homework Equations



[tex]\int_{s} \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{a} = \int_{V} \nabla \cdot \vec{A} da = \int\int\int \frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 A_{r}) r^2 \sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi = \int\int\int \frac{\partial}{\partial r}(r^2 A_{r}) \sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi = 4 \pi R^5[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Given the answer, I was able to work backwards using limits of integration of 0 to 2pi for phi, 0 to pi for theta and 0 to R on r to find out that A = r^3. Now, the question I have is how can I show that A = r^3 given the A in cartesian coordinates? Since [tex]r=\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}[/tex] its clear that [tex]A=r^2(x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k})[/tex] but to call the vector valued term r is not agreeing with me. Obviously, since the surface is a sphere, I thought it would be easier to use spherical coordinates...

Edit: Using cartesian coordinates I can find [tex]\nabla \cdot \vec{A} = 5(x^2 + y^2 + z^2) = 5r^2[/tex] but using the formula given for spherical coordinates, I would need to show A = r^3 to do a full solution in spherical.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What do you mean "A= r3"? What is A? There is no A in the statement of the problem.
 
  • #3
A is given, it is the vector. It's in the first line... Of course, to solve for A in spherical I worked backwards from the answer (I needed an R^5 in the final answer, and the divergence in spherical gives me an integral of a partial of r^2 * A, so obviously r^2 * A needs to have a 5th power, thus A = r^3, working it through, it does come out correctly).

When I try to convert the given A into spherical directly, I can only get as far as [tex]\vec{A} = r^2(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k})[/tex]

Another question I have is whether it would be easier to show it directly in cartesian or spherical...I'm leaning towards cartesian because A is given in cartesian.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
A = r^3

As Halls pointed out, that's not right.

The conversion from cartesian to spherical, and vice versa, should be found in any vector calculus text.

(or try, http://www.math.montana.edu/frankw/ccp/multiworld/multipleIVP/spherical/body.htm [Broken])

Another question I have is whether it would be easier to show it directly in cartesian or spherical...I'm leaning towards cartesian because A is given in cartesian.

The integral [itex]\int_{s} \vec{A} \cdot d\vec{a}[/itex] over [itex]x^2 + y^2 + z^2=R^2[/itex] should be easier to evaluate in spherical coordinates because of the symmetry (ie, you're integrating over a sphere).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Suggested for: Vector calculus - Divergence Theorem

Replies
4
Views
509
Replies
15
Views
838
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
692
Replies
9
Views
323
Replies
3
Views
564
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top