How Do You Convert Cartesian Vector Coordinates to Cylindrical Coordinates?

AI Thread Summary
To convert the Cartesian vector coordinates to cylindrical coordinates, the vector \vec A = (x + y)\hat x is evaluated at point P_1 (1, 2, 3). The calculations yield r = x, φ = 0, and z = 0, leading to \vec A being expressed as x\hat r at P_1. It's noted that \hat{x} represents the unit vector in the x direction, and the vector is identified as a vector field rather than a single vector. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding vector projections in cylindrical coordinates for accurate conversion.
EugP
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Transform the following vector into cylindrical coordinates and then evaluate them at the indicated points:

\vec A = (x + y)\hat x

at

P_1 (1, 2, 3)


Homework Equations


r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}

\phi = \tan^{-1}(\frac{y}{x})

z = z

The Attempt at a Solution


r = \sqrt{x^2 + 0^2} = x

\phi = \tan^{-1}(\frac{0}{x}) = 0

z = z = 0

\vec A = x\hat r at point P_1 (1, 2, 3) \Longrightarrow \hat r

Could someone please check if this is correct? There are a few more of these, but if I can do this one, then the rest are no problem. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can I assume that \hat{x} is the unit vector in the x direction? If so then (x+ y)\hat{x} is not a "vector", it is a "vector field"- a vector at each point in the xy-plane. At (1, 2, 3) (surprising how often that point shows up!), that is the vector 3 \hat{x}, of length 3 pointing in the x-direction. That vector has no z-component. The projection of the vector <2, 0> in the direction of the <1, 2> vector will be the \hat{r} component. <2, 0> minus that projection will be the component in the \theta direction.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top