Why is psi equal to psi' in vector expressions in QM?

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I am reading a book, where they use vector expressions a lot. In it they write

<br /> {\bf{M}} = \sum\limits_{\psi ,\psi &#039;,\sigma ,\sigma &#039;} {\left\langle {\psi &#039;} \right|\left\langle {\sigma &#039;} \right|{\bf{m}}\left| \sigma \right\rangle \left| \psi \right\rangle a_{\psi &#039;,\sigma &#039;}^\dag a{}_{\psi ,\sigma }} <br />

where m={t1, t2, t3} is the vector containing the three Pauli spin matrices t1, t2, t3 and a is the annihilation operator. They say this is equal to

<br /> {\bf{M}} = \frac{\hbar }{2}\sum\limits_{\psi ,\sigma ,\sigma &#039;} {\left\langle {\sigma &#039;} \right|\left( {t_1 ,t_2 ,t_3 } \right)\left| \sigma \right\rangle a_{\psi ,\sigma &#039;}^\dag a{}_{\psi ,\sigma }} <br />

I cannot see why they equal psi = psi', since m is a vector, not a diagonal matrix. What are they doing here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Without having more details about what definitions the book is using, it appears that in the expression

{\left\langle {\psi&#039;} \right|\left\langle {\sigma&#039;} \right|{\mathbf{m}}\left| \sigma \right\rangle \left| \psi \right\rangle

|\psi\rangle is the state describing the spatial physics, while |\sigma\rangle is an internal spin state. If this is true, these states lie in different Hilbert spaces. Furthermore, the operator \mathbf{m} acts only on the spin states, not |\psi\rangle. So we can rearrange

{\left\langle {\psi&#039;} | \psi \right\rangle\left\langle {\sigma&#039;} \right|{\mathbf{m}}\left| \sigma \right\rangle .
 
Ah, of course... I should have known that. I will not forget it. Thanks, you have helped me a lot today. I really appreciate it.

Best wishes,
Niles.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top