Vector Labeling Convention: Vxi or Vix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter carlyhylton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the proper labeling convention for vector components on axes, specifically whether to use Vxi or Vix. The preferred convention is to label vectors with their component indices as either (v_x, v_y) or (v_1, v_2), with numerical indices being favored for clarity in higher dimensions. In a physics context, it is suggested to place the vector label first, followed by the component label, resulting in formats like (v_{ix}, v_{iy}, v_{iz}) for initial vectors. The conversation also highlights the importance of context, distinguishing between physics and more abstract mathematical applications. Ultimately, clarity and consistency in labeling are emphasized for effective communication of vector components.
carlyhylton
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a very general question...

When labelling initial or final components on the x and y axes do you write, for example...

Vxi OR Vix

Is there a right or wrong answer? What is the convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carlyhylton said:
I have a very general question...

When labelling initial or final components on the x and y axes do you write, for example...

Vxi OR Vix

Is there a right or wrong answer? What is the convention?
Whatever ##V## stands for, the convention is either ##(v_x,v_y)## or ##(v_1,v_2)##. The former soon gets messy if higher dimensions come into play, which is why numbers as indices are preferred. If you have several points along the same dimension (axis), then some parameters would be nice: ##v_1(t_1),v_1(t_2),\ldots ## or ##(v_{11},v_{12},\ldots)##.
 
carlyhylton said:
When labelling initial or final components on the x and y axes do you write, for example...

Vxi OR Vix

Is there a right or wrong answer? What is the convention?
Is this for an introductory physics course, where we deal with vectors for physical quantities in a rectangular 3-dimensional space (x,y,z directions)? Or is it for e.g. a linear algebra course where vectors are more abstract things, in an abstract space with an arbitrary number of dimensions?

If this is a physics context, I put the vector label or number first, followed by the component label, so vectors ##\vec v_i## (i = initial) and ##\vec v_f## (f = final) have components ##(v_{ix}, v_{iy}, v_{iz})## and ##(v_{fx}, v_{fy}, v_{fz})## respectively.

(Aha, now I see this is in the General Physics forum, so I suspect this is indeed a physics context. I originally came to this question via the "Unanswered Questions" section on the home page.)
 
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top