Vector magnitude on an inclined plane - should be a quick answer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the vector magnitude from a reference point O to point A on an inclined plane. The user questions whether this magnitude is simply the length of the string, "l," or if it includes additional distances due to the mass's dimensions. It is clarified that the mass should be treated as a point mass, implying that the vector's magnitude is not just "l" but may involve other factors. The importance of resolving vectors to the plane of the ramp is emphasized, particularly regarding gravitational forces. Overall, the complexity of the problem suggests that further calculations are necessary to establish the accurate equation of motion for the point mass.
tlonster
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please see attachment.

When θ = 0, mass m is at the bottom of the inclined plane.

If I create a frame at origin O, with axes along the bottom of the plane and the dotted line (as shown in the picture), will my magnitude of the vector from O to A (along the dotted line) just be "l" (length of string)?


Homework Equations



No equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like it is l + some other distance that I have no idea how to get. How I read the question is that the ball is at the edge of plane at θ=0, so that magnitude should be l + diameter of the mass. I'm not given any dimensions, or where point A is located. Is the magnitude just the length of the string and it's a poor drawing?
 

Attachments

  • drawing.jpg
    drawing.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 399
Physics news on Phys.org
If I create a frame at origin O, with axes along the bottom of the plane and the dotted line (as shown in the picture), will my magnitude of the vector from O to A (along the dotted line) just be "l" (length of string)?
Not in general. If it were then the pendulum would just hit the bottom of the ramp and stick instead of oscillating like you want it to do.

However - the description appears to be saying that the mass is to be treated as a point mass and it just sweeps past the bottom of the ramp at zero angle without being impeded. Unless you have a number for the radius of the mass?
 
I don't have any dimensions. I'm asked to find the equation of motion of the point mass, so it's actually very involved (have three reference frames now). Maybe it ends up dropping out once I get everything set up. Should I just call that distance vector "D" for now and see what happens?
 
*distance vector magnitude "D"
 
Hint: resolve all vectors to the plane of the ramp and use that as your single reference frame. The only force not in the plane of the ramp is gravity.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top