Vector potential due to sudden burst of current in a wire

Aziza
Messages
189
Reaction score
1
There is a wire oriented in the z direction with no current in it for t<0. At t=0, there is a burst of current: I(t) = qδ(t). What is the vector potential \vec{A}? (\vec{B}=∇×\vec{A})

My solution:
let point P be located distance s from the wire, z be length along wire, and Ω be distance from point on wire to point P. Then:

\vec{A}(s,t) = \frac{μq\hat{z}}{4\pi}\int^{∞}_{-∞}\frac{δ(t-Ω/c)}{Ω}dz = \frac{μq\hat{z}}{4\pi} \frac{1}{ct}

t-Ω/c is the retarded time, thus δ(t) becomes δ(t-Ω/c), and I substituded Ω = √(s2+z2) to get the integral in terms of z. The limits are from -Inf to +Inf because for a given time t, the only contribution to the potential is from z=±√( (ct)2-s2 ). Thus I integrated the expression by plugging in this z value.

The answer is wrong however, and despite perusing the solution I cannot figure it out. The solution rewrites the integral in terms of Ω instead of z, but i don't understand why we cannot just integrate wrt z. Help is much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that the argument of the delta function is some function of ##z##. So, if you are going to use ##z## as the integration variable, you will need to use property (7) given at this link: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DeltaFunction.html
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top