Vector Rotation About Arbitrary Axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the expression for the transformation of a vector perpendicular to a rotation axis, represented as T(v⊥) = cos(θ)v⊥ + sin(θ)w. Participants clarify that this relationship arises from the geometric addition of vectors using the parallelogram law, where v⊥ and w are perpendicular unit vectors in the plane of rotation. There is also a mention of a graphical discrepancy, where a circle appears as an ellipse, but this does not affect the mathematical principles being discussed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of grasping vector addition and linear transformations in the context of rotations. Overall, the explanation helps clarify the confusion surrounding the transformation of vectors in rotational motion.
MD Aminuzzaman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am new to this forum. I was reading this document :
http://math.kennesaw.edu/~plaval/math4490/rotgen.pdf

Here the author says that from this figure
http://i.stack.imgur.com/KBw9l.png

that we can express $v_{\perp}$ like this :
$$T (v_{\perp}) = \cos(\theta) v_{\perp} + \sin(\theta) w$$

I don't understand this part. Can anybody explain how $$T(v_{\perp}) $$ is $$\cos(\theta) v_{\perp} + \sin(\theta) w$$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Any Help?
 
Isn't this obvious from the figure? I see no problem at all.

Although what should be a circle looks like an ellipse in the figure I see on my computer. Could be something wrong with the graphics the author used. Anyway, if you also see an ellipse, think of it as a circle!
 
Why we are experessing the Vector as addition of cos(θ)v⊥ and sin(θ)w ? Is it the result of 2 vector addition like Vab = Va + Vb?
 
Is your question why it is correct to do this, or what is the use of doing this?
 
why it is correct to do this ?
 
Don't you know how to add vectors geometrically, with the parallellgram law?

Here we are studying a linear tranformation which rotates every vector in the plane perpendicular to the rotation axis by the angle ##\theta## about that axis. Then ##v_\perp## is mapped to ##T(v_\perp)## in the figure. And ##v_\perp## and ##w## are perpendicular unit vectors in this plane, so we obtain the relation stated.
 
  • Like
Likes MD Aminuzzaman
Thanks now i understood. Sorry sometimes i am dumb and gets confused with simpler things.
 
MD Aminuzzaman said:
Thanks now i understood. Sorry sometimes i am dumb and gets confused with simpler things.
No problem, you're very welcome! We all get confused sometimes.
 
Back
Top