Can Vectors Have Zero Magnitude with Nonzero Components?

AI Thread Summary
A vector can have a component equal to zero while still possessing a nonzero magnitude, as demonstrated by having a non-zero x-component with a zero y-component. However, a vector cannot have zero magnitude if any of its components are nonzero, since nonzero components contribute to the overall magnitude. The discussion highlights that the magnitude of a vector is derived from the combination of its components, and if the components cancel each other out, the resultant vector can have a zero magnitude. The mathematical relationship between the components and magnitude is clarified through the Pythagorean theorem, indicating that if the magnitude is zero, all components must also be zero. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving related physics problems accurately.
kraaaaamos
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Vectors and Magnitude - Theoretical -- PLEASE HELP!

Homework Statement


1. a. Can a vector have a component equal to zero and still have nonzero magnitude? Explain.
b. Can a vector have zero magnitude if one of its components is nonzero? Explain.



Homework Equations



During lecture, the prof. mentioned that magnitudes are always positive.
There is nothing in our textbook that discusses magnitues equaling zero.

Plus, I have no idea what the question is asking.
: (


The Attempt at a Solution




I went to look through other physics websites on the net. And from what I understand . . .
If a vector has nonzero components, it cannot have a magnitude of a vector because the very fact that it has a nonzero component, already implies a nonzero magnitude.

If a vector has a magnitude of nonzero, then the magnitude must come from nonzero components of a vector?

I don't know if that's right . . . and if the explanation is sufficient? = S
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Vectors can have zero magnitude. They just can't have negative magnitude.
 
I looked at the question again.

a) Yes. It can have a Y-component of zero and a non-zero x-component, which will equal to a nonzero magnitude. Therefore, a vector can have zero component, but still have a nonzero magnitude.

b) I'm not sure. Is the magnitude zero if someone travels 6m north, then 6m south?

Because in that case, it would be possible to have zero magnitude even if you have nonzero components, IF the nonzero components cancel each other out (like in the case where someone travels 6m north and then 6m south) . I don't know if that makes sense.
 
You would need two vectors to describe the path of someone walking north, then south. Once you add the two vectors, you're left with one vector, and you can determine the north-south component, the east-west component, and the up-down component (for 3D space). You can't have two north-south components for the same vector.
 
I have no idea what the answer is. Can you give me a hint for these questions:

1. a. Can a vector have a component equal to zero and still have nonzero magnitude? Explain.
b. Can a vector have zero magnitude if one of its components is nonzero? Explain.
 
You are correct on part a. For part b, you need a better understanding of what the components of a vector are. To put it simply, if you have a vector on a plane, its length along the x-axis is one component and its length along the y-axis is the other component. Now, let's say the length along the x-axis is 1.0 . Can the vector possibly have zero length?

Here's another way to think about it. If x, y, and z are the components of a vector, its length r is

r = sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)

because of the Pythagorean theorem. If r = 0, what are the possible values of x, y, and z?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top