Vectors (incl. axial/psuedovectors)/Scalars

  • Thread starter Thread starter bon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
Area is considered a pseudovector in three-dimensional space, as it has direction associated with the normal vector to the surface, while angle of polarization is classified as a scalar since it represents only a magnitude without direction. The distinction between scalars and vectors lies in the presence of direction; vectors have both magnitude and direction, whereas scalars only have magnitude. The discussion clarifies that pseudovectors transform differently under certain transformations compared to regular vectors. Overall, the angle of polarization is confirmed to be a scalar, while area is a pseudovector due to its orientation properties.
bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Basically, trying to determine whether the following are scalars of vectors: area and angle of polarization.

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



My guess was that area would be a scalar rather than a vector, but my notes say that it is a psuedovector - is this true? In what sense does it have direction? And why is it axial rather than a proper vector?

Angle of polarization is a scalar I'm guessing, as its just a magnitude (angle) rather than direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bon said:

Homework Statement



Basically, trying to determine whether the following are scalars of vectors: area and angle of polarization.

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



My guess was that area would be a scalar rather than a vector, but my notes say that it is a psuedovector - is this true? In what sense does it have direction? And why is it axial rather than a proper vector?

Angle of polarization is a scalar I'm guessing, as its just a magnitude (angle) rather than direction?

(I think you have a small typo in the question. You mean "scalars or vectors", right?)

What are the definitions of scalars and vectors? How are they fundamentally different?
 
berkeman said:
(I think you have a small typo in the question. You mean "scalars or vectors", right?)

What are the definitions of scalars and vectors? How are they fundamentally different?

yes i did make a typo, sorry.

vectors have direction, scalars don't. both have magnitude. hence my being confused of the fact that my notes say area is a psuedovector.
 
bon said:
yes i did make a typo, sorry.

vectors have direction, scalars don't. both have magnitude. hence my being confused of the fact that my notes say area is a psuedovector.

Sorry, what's the definition of a pseudovector?
 
Do you recall doing surface integrals, like when applying Gauss's law?
 
Haven't covered that yet, sorry :(
 
To say "area is a pseudo-vector" you need to qualify a couple of things.

First that you're working in 3-space. (otherwise they are at best bi-vectors = rank two tensors)

Second that you're talking about oriented area elements (which are negative when you reverse orientation) typically defined by two vectors as the parallelogram they define.

The thing to remember is that "vectors" and "scalars" and such are so defined for arbitrary linear transformations on the space not just for rotations. A pseudo-scalar transforms like a volume element, being unchanged by rotations but scaling by the determinant of a more general transformation matrix. Since a vector defining a line element plus an area element together define a volume element (parallelepiped = oblique box) the area element must be a pseudo-vector (in 3 dim).

The vector associated with an area element is the normal vector of length numerically equal to the area. Then dotting a vector with this "pseudo-vector" gives the "pseudo-scalar" volume.

The types and dimensions follow the combinatorics of the the binomial coefficients. In 3 dim you have: 1,3,3,1 corresponding to scalar,vector, bivector=pseudo-vector, pseudo-scalar.
In four dimensions you would have: 1, 4, 6, 4, 1 and so:
scalar, vector, bivector(=pseudo-bivector), trivector=pseudo-vector, pseudo-scalar.

In five dimensions you would have 1,5, 10, 10, 5, 1 and so ...
 
  • #10
wow okay thanks for your help. So am i right in thinking angle of polarization is a scalar?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top