MHB Calculating the Angle Formed By Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter veronica1999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The angle formed by the vectors [cos 19, sin 19] and [cos 54, sin 54] can be calculated in at least two ways, both resulting in 35 degrees. The first method involves recognizing that each vector represents a unit vector at angles of 19 and 54 degrees, respectively, and taking the difference to find the angle between them. The second method applies the cosine formula for the angle between two vectors, using the dot product to derive the same result. Additionally, using the cross product in three dimensions offers another approach to find the angle. Both methods confirm that the angle between the vectors is indeed 35 degrees.
veronica1999
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Show that there are at least two ways to calculate the angle formed by the vectors [cos 19, sin 19] and [cos 54, sin 54].

1) I can draw a unit circle and easily see that the angle is 35.

2) Change the values to decimals and use the law of cosines.
(Tried this but the calculation was a bit messy)

or use cos(theta) = uv/ lullvl

3) Use dot product and get the equation for
cos(54-19) = cos54cos19 + sin54sin19

Did my answers get the point of the problem?

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
veronica1999 said:
Did my answers get the point of the problem?

I think so. The two simplest ways that I can think of would be:

1. Recognize that \(\langle\cos\theta, \sin\theta\rangle\) is a unit vector with direction \(\theta\) relative to the positive \(x\)-axis. So \(\langle\cos19^\circ, \sin19^\circ\rangle\) makes an angle of \(19^\circ\) with the \(x\)-axis, and \(\langle\cos54^\circ, \sin54^\circ\rangle\) makes an angle of \(54^\circ\). Taking the difference between the two angles, we get \(35^\circ\) as the angle between the two vectors.

2. Using the formula for the angle \(\theta\) between two vectors \(\mathbf u\) and \(\mathbf v\) gives

\[\cos\theta = \frac{\mathbf u\cdot\mathbf v}{\|\mathbf u\|\|\mathbf v\|}\]

\[\Rightarrow\cos\theta = \cos19^\circ\cos54^\circ + \sin19^\circ\sin54^\circ\]

\[\Rightarrow\cos\theta = \cos35^\circ\]

So \(\theta = 35^\circ\).
 
Another method would be to increase the dimension by one, and use the cross product. In three dimensions, the cross product and the dot product each give you a distinct way to compute the angle between two vectors.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top