Vehicle COG comparison for longitudinal rollover

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on comparing the longitudinal stability of two vehicle models based on their center of gravity (COG) height and axle split. Model A has a higher COG but is positioned further from the rear axle, while Model B has a lower COG closer to the rear axle, leading to a potential 9% greater stability for Model B. The tipping risk is analyzed through the relationship between the COG and the axis of support, with Model B demonstrating a lower angle of 56.8 degrees compared to Model A's 59.6 degrees, indicating better stability. Additionally, the importance of calculating the lateral static stability factor is emphasized for a comprehensive assessment of vehicle stability. Overall, the analysis suggests that Model B is less likely to tip over, especially in challenging conditions.
Raudi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi
I am trying to compare which of the (2) models has the greatest stability longitudinaly.
I have the COG height and longitudinal (axle split)
Model A has it COG closer to the centre of the axles (longitudinal - further from rear axle 1,487l) but sits much higher (2,537 above axle centre)
Model B has its COG closer to the rear axle (1,141) but sits much lower (1,745mm from axle centre)

Obviously there is a trade off going higher with the COG.

I believe that Model B has the greater all round stability by around 9%
The main factor that is trying to be quantified is which model is more likely to tip backwards.

X → Y ↑
Model A 1,487 2,537
Model B 1,141 1,745
 

Attachments

  • COG comparison.png
    COG comparison.png
    52.3 KB · Views: 597
Flipping forward or rearward is pitch stability, flipping on a sideslope would be lateral or roll stability. For your problem the tipping axis is the relationship between the axis of support (normal line from ground contact point of the closest wheel that goes through the wheel center) and line the connects the CG to the center of the closest tipping wheel, in your case the rear wheel. The vehicle flips when the CG moves outside the axis of support of that wheel based on the slope of the ground and acceleration. Statically, the free body diagram is a sum of the moments about that rear wheel, so the worst design occurs when the angle formed between the wheel center and CG, and horizontal - you have the x and y, so you have the angles are A - 59.6 and B - 56.8, so B is a lower angle and thus better. Don't forget to taking into account the maximum ground slope you can accommodate with a CG so close to a wheel. not sure where you got 9%?

If you need a diagram let me know...

You will also want the lateral static stability factor calculation. This calculation is used in the auto, ATV, and off-highway industries and is government metric. It takes into account suspension movement during the roll by physical testing on a tilt table.
Lateral the basic calculation is simple. static stability factor = T / 2* h (T is track width). (h is center of gravity height) for lateral assuming the cg is in the center.
 
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top